Thanks for your suggestions, Uwe. They are surely very helpful. I will try them
out and let you know if I need any further help from you.
From: Uwe Schmitz [via OSGeo.org]
[mailto:ml-node+5862681-1425697383-308...@n2.nabble.com]
Sent: 23 December 2010 19:47
To: Heng Feng
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev]
Even,
Thanks for the feedback.
Yes, starting with v8.0, the MrSID raster and lidar SDKs are packaged together.
This is not to say they are unified - in fact the two SDKs are literally just
in there sitting next to each other. Nevertheless, they are intended to be
used together for full treat
Kirk,
Would it be a big deal to provide support for DSDK 8 in gdal? At the first
sight the only issue is the missing getVersion function in MrSIDImageReader
referenced in mrsiddataset.cpp. line 1448. We could probably extract the
same information from a different API function call.
Best regards,
I turned off optimization for the C++ compiler (gcc 3.4.5), and it all worked like a charm. Removed -O2 from GDALmake.opt
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Heng,
heng.feng wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Thanks for your reply. The l0.tif file does not contain any georeferenced
> information. However, I have run the GDALINFO command on another raster
> data file which is in the same map data set provided by the customer and
> hence is supposed to be georefe
On 23/12/10 16:13, George C wrote:
Has anyone ever heard of HRTI?
HRTI is simple a very accurate DEM with very high spatial resolution.
It's not a format for data storage or transportation,
rather a (sub-)technology.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of
Has anyone ever heard of HRTI? If so, have you used it for anything? Can gdal
use it?
Thanks
George
>
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Selon Jean-Claude Repetto :
>
>> Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit :
>>
>> > I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch
>> isn't
>> > necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and
>>
Selon Jean-Claude Repetto :
> Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit :
>
> > I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch
> isn't
> > necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and
> indicate
> > what tickets you believe to be appropriate for qu
Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit :
I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch isn't
necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and indicate
what tickets you believe to be appropriate for quick closing/patching ?
This is an example,
Kirk,
I have no strong objection, but I'm not sure what the advantage is. Could you
explain the rationale for it ? As far as I can see, MrSID and MG4Lidar drivers
don't share any common code. And I have the feeling that trying to fold them can
potentially lead to issues with the build system due t
11 matches
Mail list logo
