On 2010-11-27 13:17, geographika wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it the only reason to use 64bit integers for IDs would
be for tables with more than 2 billion records (in the positive range).
There is a related question on StackOverflow about this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2124631/sql-serv
> ---Original Message---
> From: geographika
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 31 - OGR 64bit Support
> Sent: Nov 27 '10 06:17
>
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it the only reason to use 64bit integers for IDs would
> be for tables with more than 2 billi
geographika wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it the only reason to use 64bit integers for IDs would
be for tables with more than 2 billion records (in the positive range).
There is a related question on StackOverflow about this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2124631/sql-server-int-or-bigint-data
Hi,
As I understand it the only reason to use 64bit integers for IDs would
be for tables with more than 2 billion records (in the positive range).
There is a related question on StackOverflow about this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2124631/sql-server-int-or-bigint-database-table-ids
Are
