Re: [gdal-dev] corner coords in tif vs ecw

2010-11-04 Thread Jean-Claude REPETTO
On 11/04/10 20:14, kmayall wrote: Without the XML file, it uses values from the coordinate system. It is the same problem I have already noticed. You should file a bug at http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org

[gdal-dev] Re: corner coords in tif vs ecw

2010-11-04 Thread kmayall
Without the XML file, it uses values from the coordinate system. Driver: ECW/ERMapper Compressed Wavelets Files: myecw.ecw Size is 2353, 2353 Coordinate System is `' Origin = (535999.7874998,12.8624999) Pixel Size = (0.425,-0.425) Corner Coordinates: Up

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: corner coords in tif vs ecw

2010-11-04 Thread Jean-Claude REPETTO
On 11/04/10 19:25, kmayall wrote: Sorry, I've been on hiatus for a while. ECW Image Header Editor shows the top left coords using values from the coordinate system (screenshot attached), while the gdalinfo results show the corner coords in pixels. So there's likely nothing wrong with my ecw fil

[gdal-dev] Re: corner coords in tif vs ecw

2010-11-04 Thread kmayall
Sorry, I've been on hiatus for a while. ECW Image Header Editor shows the top left coords using values from the coordinate system (screenshot attached), while the gdalinfo results show the corner coords in pixels. So there's likely nothing wrong with my ecw file, just a quirk in the gdalinfo dis

[gdal-dev] Re: DXF writing and layers

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi again, I am wondering if most of my issues are a result of wrong parameters in my ogr2ogr command: Here is my command: ogr2ogr -select '' -f DXF test_ogr.dxf -dsco header=header_export_werkplan_abwasser.dxf -spat 695700 245900 696000 246100 PG:"dbname='uster' host='servername' port='5432' use

[gdal-dev] Re: DXF writing and layers

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Frank, It seems that even if the layers are present in the header.dxf file, still everything ends up in layer "0". Again - hopefully my test data will shed some light on the problem. Andreas On Wed, November 3, 2010 11:53 pm, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Andreas N

[gdal-dev] Re: DXF Writer and labels: encoding, angle and anchor position?

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Frank, Regarding the encoding: It seems like ogr2ogr just writes everything out as UTF-8. My data source (postgres database) is also utf-8. Autocad and FME however, don't like the utf-8 encoding. They probably expect some Windows encoding (either ISO-8859-15 or Latin 1 or whatever Windows uses

[gdal-dev] Re: dxf writer: specifying dash patterns with ogr-feature styles

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Frank, I changed the delimiters to a space but the dashed lines still show up as continuous lines in Autocad or FME viewer. I will provide test-data and file a bug. Thanks a lot, Andreas On Wed, November 3, 2010 11:59 pm, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Andreas Neuma

[gdal-dev] Re: DXF writing and layers

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Frank, Still no luck here with the layers. Just to be sure: the layers aren't present in the header file. They should be created by ogr. Is this correct that I don't necessarily have to create the layers in advance? Well - I think I will report a bug and make you the data available that I am

Re: [gdal-dev] status of the OGR Norwegian SOSI support

2010-11-04 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Hi, I need to clarify the things a little bit. Actually the compiled binaries for the FYBA library are downloadable from here: http://www.statkart.no/nor/SOSI/Program/ However this version depends on the Visual Studio 2005 Win32 CRT libraries (msvcr80.dll) which would provide at the most to includ

[gdal-dev] status of the OGR Norwegian SOSI support

2010-11-04 Thread lucvanlinden
Does anyone know the status of the OGR Norwegian SOSI support? Tamas Szekeres, confirmed it is not being included in the daily built binaries as the SOSI support depends on a missing FYBA binaries, which seems to be the last reference in this ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3638#commen