Hi Steven,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Steven Bird wrote:
>
> My question is does anyone have an idea of the dollar costs and licence
> mechanisms to legally use directdwg with ogr. I can't seem to find this
> info on the net.
>
The details of the Open Design Alliance memberships are avail
A bit of a newbie question
We use OGR with Mapserver and need it to be able to read dwgs. I understand
that directdwg code has been moved out of the core package to spike. OGR pages
say the use of this is 'available under fairly permissive terms'.
My question is does anyone have an ide
Either the licensing terms or the selected way of distributing the SDK
prevents me to utilize this version at http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/. I
prefer to stay with v3.3 which did eventually compile on both
platforms I wanted to support.
1. As the authors decided to provide the binaries only they sho
Even Rouault wrote:
It certainly should be easier to use, since it is a binary library, like
Lizardtech does for mrsid, so you don't have to worry about compiling the
library. The what's new pdf says it supports the old 3.x interface, so it
should not be too much trouble to integrate into the cu
> It certainly should be easier to use, since it is a binary library, like
> Lizardtech does for mrsid, so you don't have to worry about compiling the
> library. The what's new pdf says it supports the old 3.x interface, so it
> should not be too much trouble to integrate into the current GDAL.
O
On Aug 29, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Paul Meems wrote:
> It seems ERDAS has finally released their new ECW and JPEG2000 SDK:
> http://www.erdas.com/tabid/84/currentid/1142/default.aspx
>
> I'm not a lawyer, not even a native English speaker so I don't fully
> understand their EULA.
... ugh, looks horri
It seems ERDAS has finally released their new ECW and JPEG2000 SDK:
http://www.erdas.com/tabid/84/currentid/1142/default.aspx
I'm not a lawyer, not even a native English speaker so I don't fully
understand their EULA.
I don't know if it is allowed but will GDAL replace the old libecwj2 (v3.3)
wit
ahmet temiz wrote:
thank you
I think I need one more clarification. Doesn't "field" have same
meaning with column ?
or what does "field" correspond to in sql jargon ?
I will appreciate if you make me clear
Ahmet,
For our purposes field and column are essentially the same.
Best regards,
--
-
