Hi.
Suggest to Immediately Upgrade to 1.7.0
also check if the users have correct Page File Settings for the Hard Drive
Partitions.
1.7.0 is working excellently for Huge Images.
Thank You
Bhasker
Alexande
2010/2/1 Greg Coats :
> Yes, GDAL can successfully process images with 15,000 columns by 15,000 rows.
> I have used GDAL on a computer with only 3 GB RAM to process an image with
> Image Width: 260,000 Image Length: 195,000. What version of GAL are you
> using? Are you using GDAL 1.7.0? What ope
Yes, GDAL can successfully process images with 15,000 columns by 15,000 rows. I
have used GDAL on a computer with only 3 GB RAM to process an image with Image
Width: 260,000 Image Length: 195,000. What version of GAL are you using? Are
you using GDAL 1.7.0? What operating system are you using? H
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> By the way, makefile.vc of PCIDISK SDK [1] pulled from external location
>> to frmts/pcidsk/sdk override the flags specified in nmake.opt
>> and explicitly set to /MD
>>
>> This may also potentially cause problems w
Regarding the diff function
"diff": computes the difference between 2 raster bands (b1 - b2)
Since the result of diff could be a negative number, for example 99-150=-51, I
suggest that there be an additional function that provides the absolute value
of diff, which would be 51 in this example.
Gre
Hi all
I want to write a raster calculator and have two problems with Python
and GDAL.
My first problem: when calculating a difference between two raster bands I
get a wrong results. Raster in ERDAS IMAGINE format (HFA) and bands extracted
correctly. When I print each band and subtraction result
Hi Matt,
Il giorno Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:58 -0600
Matt Klaric ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Frank Warmerdam
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think the VRT approach supports actually adding
> > different images together, only overlaying and rescaling.
> >
> >
> However, pixel functions c
