Re: [gdal-dev] Fastest vector format for combining shapefiles

2009-10-18 Thread Chris Barker
Simon Greener wrote: What else is there to do for its adoption as the new shapefile for the open source community? I heard someone say once that a specification isn't a standard unless there is more than one implementation (preferably more). Is there any other way to read or write a spatialit

Re: [gdal-dev] Fastest vector format for combining shapefiles

2009-10-18 Thread Simon Greener
Matt, (Sorry for the duplicate email, I initially replied only to you and not the list.) In my experience the open source community rarely, if ever, defines a thing before creating it. What usually happens is that somebody (whether an individual or small group) builds somethings that works, or

Re: [gdal-dev] opening an S-57 dataset directory

2009-10-18 Thread Frank Warmerdam
gdal user wrote: Frank, I am just reading the code in s57reader.cpp. It does look like there is code there to search directories in Primar format. Look right after the line that reads: "else // file is store on Primar generated cd". Mike, Good point. That looks like code added by someone ot

Re: [gdal-dev] opening an S-57 dataset directory

2009-10-18 Thread gdal user
Frank, I am just reading the code in s57reader.cpp. It does look like there is code there to search directories in Primar format. Look right after the line that reads: "else // file is store on Primar generated cd". --Mike Frank Warmerdam wrote: > > Mr. Xonx, > > Can you give more information o

Re: [gdal-dev] opening an S-57 dataset directory

2009-10-18 Thread Frank Warmerdam
gdal user wrote: I think there is a bit more there than that. The driver (at least the older version we use) will also deal with the multi-level style Primar format systems. ... Frank Warmerdam wrote: The driver will only find update files if they are in the same directory as the .000 file, ha

Re:Re:Re:Re: [gdal-dev] how to test the creation and deletion capability of ogr?

2009-10-18 Thread Even Rouault
Selon atubar : > Hi, your explanation is so exhaustive, nothing better than thank you once > more. > Maybe the last one question on this topic, is "SUBDATASETS" also shared by > Gtiff? --> The answer was in my previous email ;-) ___ gdal-dev mailing li

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.h: No such file or directory

2009-10-18 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Peter J Halls wrote: > Mateusz, > > the extract from the standard does not say there is no difference: it > says that this is implementation dependent - that implementors are > free to differentiate if they wish and, indeed, that the #include " " > form is optional. Peter, There is no differen

Re:Re:Re:Re: [gdal-dev] how to test the creation and deletion capability of ogr?

2009-10-18 Thread atubar
Hi, your explanation is so exhaustive, nothing better than thank you once more. Maybe the last one question on this topic, is "SUBDATASETS" also shared by Gtiff? ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/g

Re: [gdal-dev] can't access e00 file using gdal...

2009-10-18 Thread Andrew Loughhead
Jeff Hamann wrote: Any hints? What kind of file is this, really? Its an "export" file from ArcGIS Workstation. At the "Arc" command prompt, its generated with the "export" command. The export command can export both vector and raster data, but I think its rarely used for raster data, because