Default compile fails due to the bug I reported here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2628
~Seth
On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an R
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:03 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
- tiff_write
TEST: tiff_write_55 ... PROJCS["Equirectangular
Mars",GEOGCS["GCS_Mars",DATUM["unknown",SPHEROID["unnamed",
3394813.857975945,0]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["degree",
0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Equirectangular"],PAR
I'm working on some autotest errors for 1.6, and I need some help to
figure out how to fix them.
- ogr_gml
TEST: ogr_gml_1 ... ERROR 1: element missing value.
fail (blowup)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "pymod/gdaltest.py", line 89, in run_tests
result = func()
File "./ogr
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
William Kyngesburye wrote:
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into
1.6? Tested on RC1, no problems.
William,
I am not in favor of apply the change for 2661 in
Le Sunday 30 November 2008 20:01:02 William Kyngesburye, vous avez écrit :
> A couple notes on the autotests while I wait for RC2 to compile:
>
> Still have problems with the DODS test - it always fails to connect to
> the test host.
The OGR DODS ? It fails for me too : the test must rely on a ser
William Kyngesburye wrote:
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into 1.6?
Tested on RC1, no problems.
William,
I am not in favor of apply the change for 2661 in the 1.6 branch. I'm not
opposed to it going into tru
A couple notes on the autotests while I wait for RC2 to compile:
Still have problems with the DODS test - it always fails to connect to
the test host.
ECW tests 14 and 15 check for the wrong driver - they are jp2ecw tests
but check for ecw. (I disabled JP2 in my ECW library build for some
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into
1.6? Tested on RC1, no problems.
On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 wa
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an RC2. RC2
is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC2.zip - source as a zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.0RC2.tar.gz - source as
