I've just noticed that swig/python/setup.py was not updated and still says
gdal_version = '1.6.0beta1'
Le Friday 28 November 2008 05:07:04 Frank Warmerdam, vous avez écrit :
> Folks,
>
> I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 1.6.0 release candidate, posted at:
>
> http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC1
+1 to each of the actions.
Best regards,
Tamas
2008/11/28 Frank Warmerdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Folks,
>
> I would like to prepare a GDAL 1.4.5 release. I anticipate this being
> the final 1.4.x release. There have apparently been 15 tickets closed
> since the 1.4.4 release that claim to hav
> Does anyone object to my taking on the role of release manager for a
> 1.4.5 release? I will prepare a release candidate for review and voting
> by the PSC if there is not.
>
+1
> Does anyone object to make taking on the role of release manager for a
> 1.5.4 release?
+1
didier
--
RICHARD
Le Friday 28 November 2008 21:23:32 Frank Warmerdam, vous avez écrit :
> Folks,
>
> I would like to prepare a GDAL 1.4.5 release. I anticipate this being
> the final 1.4.x release. There have apparently been 15 tickets closed
> since the 1.4.4 release that claim to have impacted the 1.4 branch.
>
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Does anyone object to my taking on the role of release manager for a
1.4.5 release? I will prepare a release candidate for review and voting
by the PSC if there is not.
+1
Does anyone object to make taking on the role of release manager for a
1.5.4 release?
+1
-
Folks,
I would like to prepare a GDAL 1.4.5 release. I anticipate this being
the final 1.4.x release. There have apparently been 15 tickets closed
since the 1.4.4 release that claim to have impacted the 1.4 branch.
Does anyone object to my taking on the role of release manager for a
1.4.5 rele
Folks,
I have prepared the following GDAL/OGR 1.6 packages based on RC1.
gdal16 - main dll and .exe's
gdal16-python - python bindings, and python scripts
gdal16-mrsid - mrsid plugin
gdal16-autotest - the 1.6 autotest suite.
Similar to the gdal-dev package, you need to run gdal16.bat in
Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
a few issues found while running autotests:
- tiff_write_55 fails because of the reordering of the projection parameters
done in r15834. Just swapping the standard_parallel_1 parameter in the
expected WKT before false_easting makes it pass.
Even,
fix committed.
- os
Hi,
a few issues found while running autotests:
- tiff_write_55 fails because of the reordering of the projection parameters
done in r15834. Just swapping the standard_parallel_1 parameter in the
expected WKT before false_easting makes it pass.
- osr_esri_10 also fails because we no longer used
