[gdal-dev] [Fwd: Re: [GRASS-user] Tips for setting up an new FOSS-GEO-linux-box]

2008-11-02 Thread Nikos Alexandris
My apologies for the "off-topic" post. I started an osgeo-wikipage (see attached message). It would be extremely useful if experienced users/developers would contribute by sharing some of their secrets on how to best setup an osgeo GIS workstation. Kind regards, Nikos --- Begin Message --- I've s

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.6.0 Beta 1 Available

2008-11-02 Thread William Kyngesburye
One bug that hasn't had any action taken: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/1242 I wonder - I build OGDI with proj support. For use only in GDAL, is that necessary? If not, then I could remove PROJ from my OGDI and this bug will be meaningless, to me at least. - William Kyngesburye

Re: [gdal-dev] maintain resolution with gdalwarp

2008-11-02 Thread Markus Neteler
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Does one need to set a the -tr (resolution of output) argument to > gdalwarp to ensure the resolution of the input is maintained in the > output? See also "gdalwarp: suggestion for '-kr' (keep resolution) flag" http://trac.os

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL reference counting is thread unsafe

2008-11-02 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Martin, Seems reasonable, however I expect we could avoid using critical sections in the windows code in this particular case using the Interlocked function would be quite enough. I'm uncertain how the windows headers are included in your code, but it looks like simply including in some places ma