Re: [gdal-dev] Guidance sought on using gdal-translate

2008-07-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Christopher Hunt wrote: Hi Frank, Thanks for the reply and for the confirmation that I'm on the right track. Dumb newbie question: wouldn't most aerial photos taken, say, from 12,000ft be ortho in their projection? Christopher, I don't think that is a good assumption at all. And if you wer

Re: [gdal-dev] Guidance sought on using gdal-translate

2008-07-29 Thread Christopher Hunt
Hi Frank, Thanks for the reply and for the confirmation that I'm on the right track. Dumb newbie question: wouldn't most aerial photos taken, say, from 12,000ft be ortho in their projection? Cheers, -C ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.o

Re: [gdal-dev] Swig Java bindings GDAL 1.5 Windows

2008-07-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Nidel, Mike wrote: I'm building GDAL 1.5 (from the branch) on both Linux and Windows. I noticed a difference in the way swig is invoked between the GNUMakefile and the makefile.vc. The result is java code that's slightly different at first glance but vastly different when you run it (it leads to

[gdal-dev] Swig Java bindings GDAL 1.5 Windows

2008-07-29 Thread Nidel, Mike
I'm building GDAL 1.5 (from the branch) on both Linux and Windows. I noticed a difference in the way swig is invoked between the GNUMakefile and the makefile.vc. The result is java code that's slightly different at first glance but vastly different when you run it (it leads to a hotspot crash). I t

Re: [gdal-dev] Downsampling with gdalwarp

2008-07-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Stanley Glidden wrote: Hi, Can someone tell me if anything has changed in terms of being able to downsample using averaging with gdalwarp. I found a post from a few years back that said the only way to accomplish this is through an option in the virtual file driver. Is this still the case? If so

[gdal-dev] Downsampling with gdalwarp

2008-07-29 Thread Stanley Glidden
Hi, Can someone tell me if anything has changed in terms of being able to downsample using averaging with gdalwarp. I found a post from a few years back that said the only way to accomplish this is through an option in the virtual file driver. Is this still the case? If so what is the syntax to

Re: [gdal-dev] Guidance sought on using gdal-translate

2008-07-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Christopher Hunt wrote: Hi there, Being new to gdal I'm hoping that someone can help me by verifying my gdal_translate command. Thanks in advance. I have an aerial photo of an airport which I therefore assume is orthographic. Three points have been provided to me which I am assuming to be w

Re: [gdal-dev] make install error GDAL 1.5.2

2008-07-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Daniel Diaz wrote: I'am trying to install gdal from the trunk with mrsid option and the make succeed, the installation succeed but it gave me this error in the make install make -C mrsid install-obj make[2]: Entering directory `/home/danieldiaz/gdal/frmts/mrsid' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `

Re: [gdal-dev] make install error GDAL 1.5.2

2008-07-29 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Daniel Diaz wrote: > I'am trying to install gdal from the trunk with mrsid option and the > make succeed, the installation succeed but it gave me this error in > the make install > make -C mrsid install-obj > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/danieldiaz/gdal/frmts/mrsid' > make[2]: Nothing to be

[gdal-dev] make install error GDAL 1.5.2

2008-07-29 Thread Daniel Diaz
I'am trying to install gdal from the trunk with mrsid option and the make succeed, the installation succeed but it gave me this error in the make install make -C mrsid install-obj make[2]: Entering directory `/home/danieldiaz/gdal/frmts/mrsid' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-obj'. also t

[gdal-dev] Guidance sought on using gdal-translate

2008-07-29 Thread Christopher Hunt
Hi there, Being new to gdal I'm hoping that someone can help me by verifying my gdal_translate command. Thanks in advance. I have an aerial photo of an airport which I therefore assume is orthographic. Three points have been provided to me which I am assuming to be wgs84: point1 = -0.49