Hi Arthur!
On 2025-03-22T15:48:18+0100, Arthur Cohen wrote:
> Thanks for testing that commit. I think a partial revert is not
> necessary, as I'm currently
> working on our milestone to make all Rust code compile with a Rust
> 1.49 toolchain.
>
> I think pushing a partial revert upstream would ju
Hi!
On 2025-03-17T16:33:34+0100, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
> From: Kushal Pal
>
> libgrust/ChangeLog:
>
> * libformat_parser/Cargo.toml:
> Used crate-type instead of depricated crate_type.
> * libformat_parser/generic_format_parser/src/lib.rs:
> Remove dead code.
>
Hi Thomas!
Thanks for testing that commit. I think a partial revert is not
necessary, as I'm currently
working on our milestone to make all Rust code compile with a Rust
1.49 toolchain.
I think pushing a partial revert upstream would just create some
confusion when the
correct version of the code
From: Kushal Pal
libgrust/ChangeLog:
* libformat_parser/Cargo.toml:
Used crate-type instead of depricated crate_type.
* libformat_parser/generic_format_parser/src/lib.rs:
Remove dead code.
* libformat_parser/src/lib.rs: Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Kushal Pal
