https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
I'm not seeing it anywhere, and I consistently was before.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
It is, as r15-9287-g89ca1e3cb697a8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
.cargo/ at top-level with:
.cargo/config.toml:
```
[net]
offline = true
```
and CARGO_HOME="${srcdir}/.cargo" or something like that would work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117869
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Since r15-9083-gd560f3f9594339, 1.49 should work again, but it needs
documenting still.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #3 from Sam Jame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116187
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-3-25
--- Comment #1 from Sam James --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108124
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||86656, 63426
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
What version of rustc? (rustc --version)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|build failure:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
In libgrust/libformat_parser/Makefile.am, we have:
```
# TODO: Improve `cargo` invocation with host specific flags, possibly creating
a $(CARGO) variable?
$(LIBFORMAT_PARSER): $(srcdir)/Cargo.toml $(srcdir)/src/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org, gcc-rust at gcc dot gnu.org,
pierre-emmanuel.patry at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116561
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1)
> This appears to be due to recent commit
> r15-3328-g673a448aa24efedd5ac140ebf7bfe652d7a6a846 "Optimize initialization
> of small padded objects".
>
> Given this c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
_gimple' failed
||since
||r15-3328-g673a448aa24efedd5
||ac140ebf7bfe652d7a6a846
CC| |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116192
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108102
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
We should add a -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS build into the rust CI but we should also
really encourage at least one of the CI efforts on gcc-regressions etc to do
such a config too.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
e.g.
```
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./work/build/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_stack.h:293:
void std::stack<_Tp, _Sequence>::pop() [with _Tp = unsigned int; _Sequence =
std::
Priority: P3
Component: rust
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org, gcc-rust at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 58820
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
Priority: P3
Component: rust
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org, gcc-rust at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
During bootstrap, I noticed:
```
/var/tmp/portage/sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115453
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||collin.funk1 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
||/gccrs/issues/1996
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
(sorry, I misread Rainer's comment - he was talking about glibc too.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
> for the pkg build (original report): no
> for the quick test I did earlier: yes because I was rushing, oops
/tmp/build $ ~/git/gcc/configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc
--enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
for the pkg build (original report): no
for the quick test I did earlier: yes because I was rushing, oops
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
ftr (given I only gave a packaged build log) repro'd with ./configure
--prefix=/tmp/gcc --enable-languages=c,c++,rust --enable-multilib
--with-multilib-list=m32,m64 --with-checking=yes,extra,rtl --disable-analyz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56898&action=edit
build.log.xz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56897&action=edit
config.log (libgrust)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org, gcc-rust at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This started on this week's snapshot (obviously). I've not analysed it at all
yet.
```
/bin/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|spam|rust
CC|
38 matches
Mail list logo
