Hi Philip,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 11:22:43AM +0100, Philip Herron wrote:
> > Analyzing compilation unit
> > /home/mark/gccrs/gcc/testsuite/rust.test/compile/methods1.rs: In function
> > ‘Rectangle_sum_x’:
> > /home/mark/gccrs/gcc/testsuite/rust.test/compile/methods1.rs:26:5: error:
> > type misma
Hi Marc!
On 6/2/21 7:02 PM, Marc wrote:
>> libunwind on ia64 can be a bit tricky sometimes, so it might not be gccrs
>> which is to be blamed here.
>
> Ah, sorry, already opened :). I'll close it if needed !
>
> https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/issues/474
Let's keep it open for the time being
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hello!
>
> Just built gccrs revision 59b417323b25072aff2662f1f54f417f7b7ded61 on Debian
> unstable s390x.
>
> The testsuite fails with the following failures. Attaching the log file.
>
> Adrian
Hi again!
looks like all errors here (ICE) are the same as seen
Hello!
Just built gccrs revision 59b417323b25072aff2662f1f54f417f7b7ded61 on Debian
unstable s390x.
The testsuite fails with the following failures. Attaching the log file.
Adrian
=== rust tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi Marc!
>
> On 6/2/21 6:58 PM, Marc wrote:
>> Thanks for testing this! IIUC, this is an issue on our side, so I'll
>> open an issue.
>
> Let me test a plain GCC build with just C and C++ first to make sure it's
> not a general GCC problem on ia64.
>
> libunwin
Hi Marc!
On 6/2/21 6:58 PM, Marc wrote:
> Thanks for testing this! IIUC, this is an issue on our side, so I'll
> open an issue.
Let me test a plain GCC build with just C and C++ first to make sure it's
not a general GCC problem on ia64.
libunwind on ia64 can be a bit tricky sometimes, so it migh
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hello!
>
> On 6/2/21 3:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> Is libunwind installed ? Not sure why your exe needs it, maybe that's a
>>> particularity of ia64?
>>
>> Yes, gcc explicitly needs libunwind on ia64 unless it's configured to use
>> the interna
Hello!
On 6/2/21 3:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Is libunwind installed ? Not sure why your exe needs it, maybe that's a
>> particularity of ia64?
>
> Yes, gcc explicitly needs libunwind on ia64 unless it's configured to use
> the internal version. I might be able to fix that myself.
Hi Marc!
On 6/2/21 3:05 PM, Marc wrote:
>> Sure, just found the log file. Didn't know that there was one ;).
>
> Thanks! Looks like something is missing :
>
> ./block_expr1.exe: error while loading shared libraries: libunwind.so.7:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Ah
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi Marc!
>
> On 6/2/21 2:41 PM, Marc wrote:
>>> # of expected passes2347
>>> # of unexpected failures21
>>> # of expected failures 26
>>
>> Would it be possible to have the corresponding .log file ? Looks like
>> nearly all executi
Hi!
Trying to build revision fd9e53249c6c269e68f9aca71b3d17b3ecee8e8a on 64-bit
PowerPC (big-endian) succeeds. The testsuite passes without any issues.
Attaching the log file, quick summary below:
=== rust tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /us
Hi Marc!
On 6/2/21 2:41 PM, Marc wrote:
>> # of expected passes2347
>> # of unexpected failures21
>> # of expected failures 26
>
> Would it be possible to have the corresponding .log file ? Looks like
> nearly all execution tests are KO (3 out of 4...).
Sure, just fo
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi!
Hi!
> I have started to test gccrs on various targets supported by Debian to see if
> there are any portability issues with the code. The first target I have tested
> is Debian unstable ia64.
Thanks !
> # of expected passes2347
> # of unexp
Hi!
Trying to build revision fd9e53249c6c269e68f9aca71b3d17b3ecee8e8a on 32-bit
PowerPC fails with:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Woverlo
Hi!
I have started to test gccrs on various targets supported by Debian to see if
there are any portability issues with the code. The first target I have tested
is Debian unstable ia64.
I tested revision fd9e53249c6c269e68f9aca71b3d17b3ecee8e8a.
The code builds without any obvious issues and I w
15 matches
Mail list logo
