Re: [r15-3529 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116588.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 4:11 PM haochen.jiang wrote: > > On Linux/x86_64, > > 506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6 is the first bad commit > commit 506417dbc8b1cbc1133a5322572cf94b671aadf6 > Author: Andrew MacLeod > Date: Fri Sep 6 11:42:14 2024 -0400 > > Before running fast VRP, make su

Re: [r15-853 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bitops-9.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "bit_not_expr, " 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:30 PM haochen.jiang wrote: > > On Linux/x86_64, > > c5a7628470a7fb801ebeea82e16a4549db43bfa5 is the first bad commit > commit c5a7628470a7fb801ebeea82e16a4549db43bfa5 > Author: Andrew Pinski > Date: Sun May 26 17:59:21 2024 -0700 > > match: Use uniform_integer_cst_

Re: [r15-5336 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-4.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 16 y == 2 on Linux/x86_64

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 9:27 AM haochen.jiang wrote: > > On Linux/x86_64, > > cee7d080d5c2a5fb8125878998b742c040ec88b4 is the first bad commit > commit cee7d080d5c2a5fb8125878998b742c040ec88b4 > Author: Jan Hubicka > Date: Sat Nov 16 14:04:32 2024 +0100 > > Ignore conditions guarding __buil

RE: Regressions on native/master at commit r16-29 vs commit r16-21 on Linux/x86_64

I have a fix for the testcases. Just need to increase the size from 32 to 1024. Basically with 32, vectors are used for the memcpy which allows to optimize it; just differently and not what is being tested here. I am hoping 1024 is big enough not to hit another target which does memcpy for 1024

Re: [r16-22 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78408-3.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop1 "after previous" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Fri, Apr 18, 2025, 7:29 PM haochen.jiang wrote: > On Linux/x86_64, > > 94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 is the first bad commit > commit 94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 > Author: Andrew Pinski > Date: Thu Feb 20 16:09:05 2025 -0800 > > gimple-fold: Improve optimize_memc

Re: [r15-7894 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Wreturn-mismatch-6.c (test for warnings, line 40) on Linux/x86_64

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 2:39 PM haochen.jiang wrote: > > On Linux/x86_64, > > cf65235e03d2eb1667624943eae8f7fc355bceaf is the first bad commit > commit cf65235e03d2eb1667624943eae8f7fc355bceaf > Author: Andrew Pinski > Date: Thu Mar 6 16:07:02 2025 -0800 > > c: Fix warning after an error on

Re: [r16-372 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test on Linux/x86_64

On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:19 PM haochen.jiang wrote: > > On Linux/x86_64, > > 064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4 is the first bad commit > commit 064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4 > Author: Jan Hubicka > Date: Sun May 4 10:52:35 2025 +0200 > > Improve maybe_hot handling in inl