Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10419 vs commit r15-10417 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10419 vs commit r15-10417 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12095 vs commit r14-12094 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12095 vs commit r14-12094 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-com

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-4212-gf256a13f8aed: 2 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit gcc-16-4212-gf256a13f8aed | Author: Jakub Jelinek | Date: Sat Oct 4 09:50:39 2025 +0200 | | c++, gimplify: Implement C++26 P27

Regressions on master at commit r16-4261 vs commit r16-4257 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4261 vs commit r16-4257 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr120683-2.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr120683-3.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr120683-4.c check-function-bod

Re: Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4187 vs commit r16-4184 on Linux/x86_64

I filed PR122168 for the ops_overflow_neg.cc failure as I see it too.

Regressions on master at commit r16-4389 vs commit r16-4386 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4389 vs commit r16-4386 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-7.c -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times gimple "f3 \\(obj1, obj2, 1, a, cp, d\\);" 1 FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-7.c -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times g

Regressions on master at commit r16-4451 vs commit r16-4448 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4451 vs commit r16-4448 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4298 vs commit r16-4289 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4298 vs commit r16-4289 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_82.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_82.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED" F

Regressions on master at commit r16-4256 vs commit r16-4253 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4256 vs commit r16-4253 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: compiler driver --help=param option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: " --param=auto-profile-bbs=<0,1> Build basic block profile using auto profile" FAIL: compiler driver --help=para

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4256 vs commit r16-4253 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4256 vs commit r16-4253 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: compiler driver --help=param option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: " --param=auto-profile-bbs=<0,1> Build basic block profile using auto profile" FAIL: compiler driver --help=para

[r16-4349 Regression] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_ref/float.cc -std=gnu++26 execution test on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 90dde804626f1344f0d63827709406b135433272 is the first bad commit commit 90dde804626f1344f0d63827709406b135433272 Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo Date: Mon Dec 9 01:32:27 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Handle cv-qualified types in atomic and atomic_ref [PR115402] caused FAIL: 29_atomics

Regressions on master at commit r16-4395 vs commit r16-4394 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4395 vs commit r16-4394 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4451 vs commit r16-4446 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4451 vs commit r16-4446 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

Regressions on master at commit r16-4344 vs commit r16-4334 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4344 vs commit r16-4334 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-7.c -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times gimple "f3 \\(obj1, obj2, 1, a, cp, d\\);" 1 FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-7.c -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump-times gimple "f3 \\(

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4289 vs commit r16-4281 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4289 vs commit r16-4281 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr121987.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr119919.c scan-tree-dump vect "loop vectorized using 8 byte vectors"

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10367 vs commit r15-10357 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10367 vs commit r15-10357 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4077 vs commit r16-4072 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4077 vs commit r16-4072 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87908.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87908.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87908.f90 -O0 (tes

Regressions on master at commit r16-4394 vs commit r16-4390 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4394 vs commit r16-4390 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r16-4248 vs commit r16-4241 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4248 vs commit r16-4241 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/async_io_1.f90 -Os execution test

Regressions on master at commit r16-4285 vs commit r16-4281 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4285 vs commit r16-4281 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr121987.c (test for excess errors)

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12059 vs commit r14-12055 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12059 vs commit r14-12055 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O2 execution test FAIL: c-c++-com

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-4464-g6883d51304f: 6 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit gcc-16-4464-g6883d51304f | Author: Avinash Jayakar | Date: Fri Oct 17 12:38:59 2025 +0530 | | vect: Add pattern recog

[r16-4425 Regression] FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 5dba17a3e709859968f939354e6e5e8d796012d3 is the first bad commit commit 5dba17a3e709859968f939354e6e5e8d796012d3 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu Oct 9 11:09:34 2025 +0100 libstdc++: Avoid overflow in timeout conversions [PR113327] caused FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-4411-gb6e802fd55d: 4 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit gcc-16-4411-gb6e802fd55d | Author: Richard Biener | Date: Fri Oct 10 14:09:32 2025 +0200 | | Rewrite reduction chain

Regressions on master at commit r16-4272 vs commit r16-4269 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4272 vs commit r16-4269 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r16-4124 vs commit r16-4123 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4124 vs commit r16-4123 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12051 vs commit r14-12039 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12051 vs commit r14-12039 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-com

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-4338-g4e44fe4280b: 2 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit gcc-16-4338-g4e44fe4280b | Author: Jakub Jelinek | Date: Thu Oct 9 22:41:30 2025 +0200 | | c++: C++26 va_start - part

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12059 vs commit r14-12055 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12059 vs commit r14-12055 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12055 vs commit r14-12051 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12055 vs commit r14-12051 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O0 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_barrier.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: g++

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4080 vs commit r16-4077 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4080 vs commit r16-4077 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87908.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87908.f90 -Os (internal

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12085 vs commit r14-12059 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12085 vs commit r14-12059 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -

Regressions on master at commit r16-4433 vs commit r16-4424 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4433 vs commit r16-4424 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: std/time/freestanding.cc -std=gnu

Regressions on master at commit r16-4483 vs commit r16-4473 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4483 vs commit r16-4473 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "_gfortran_caf_atomic_define \\(caf_token.., 0, 1, &value.., 0B, 1, 4\\);" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-4474 vs commit r16-4473 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-4474 vs commit r16-4473 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "_gfortran_caf_atomic_define \\(caf_token.., 0, 1, &value.., 0B, 1, 4\\);" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12094 vs commit r14-12085 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-12094 vs commit r14-12085 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: