Regressions on master at commit r16-2084 vs commit r16-2083 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2084 vs commit r16-2083 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 23_containers/forward_list/cons/self_move.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 23_containers/forward_list/cons/self_move.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 23_containers/forward

Regressions on master at commit r16-2048 vs commit r16-2044 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2048 vs commit r16-2044 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memset-pr120683-10.c check-function-bodies foo New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r16-2078 vs commit r16-2071 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2078 vs commit r16-2071 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-10.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-11.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-12.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-2052 vs commit r16-2044 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2052 vs commit r16-2044 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memset-pr120683-12.c check-function-bodies foo New passes:

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-2065-g8abc2e66be72: 3 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit gcc-16-2065-g8abc2e66be72 | Author: Jason Merrill | Date: Wed Jul 2 05:15:01 2025 -0400 | | c++: -Wno-abbreviated-aut

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-2078 vs commit r16-2071 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2078 vs commit r16-2071 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-10.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-11.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-12.c check-function-bodies foo FAIL: gcc.