Regressions on master at commit r16-1494 vs commit r16-1490 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r16-1490 vs commit r16-1485 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C -std=c++26 (te
Regressions on master at commit r16-1488 vs commit r16-1485 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C -std=c++26 (te
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
some details below.
In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
| commit gcc-16-1487-g774ae8734f0e
| Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo
| Date: Mon Jun 9 23:13:21 2025 +0200
|
| libstdc++: add range
I will do that.
Thx,
Haochen
From: Andrew Pinski
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2025 10:52 PM
Cc: gb.de...@gmail.com; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org; GCC Patches
; Jiang, Haochen
Subject: Re: [r16-1429 Regression] FAIL: g++.target/i386/vect-pragma-target-2.C
-std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) on Lin
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025, 10:17 PM haochen.jiang
wrote:
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> dcb9af06212e8bb36e84a1b8498c625c29abeb6f is the first bad commit
> commit dcb9af06212e8bb36e84a1b8498c625c29abeb6f
> Author: Gwenole Beauchesne
> Date: Mon Jun 2 14:44:55 2025 -0700
>
> c/c++: Handle '#pragma GCC ta
