Regressions on master at commit r16-69 vs commit r16-63 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
Hi!
On 2025-04-17T18:15:50+, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
wrote:
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
> some details below.
>
> In bootstrap_check master-arm-check_bootstrap, after:
> | commit gcc-15-9463-gaa3e72f9430
> | Author: Thomas Schw
Regressions on master at commit r16-63 vs commit r16-57 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
New passes:
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11675 vs commit r14-11664 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-
Hi!
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:55, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2025-04-17T18:15:50+, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
> wrote:
> > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please
> > find some details below.
> >
> > In bootstrap_check master-arm-check_boots
Regressions on master at commit r16-89 vs commit r16-87 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92834.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MAX_EXPR <" 8
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92834.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MAX_EXPR <" 8
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94786.c scan-tree-dump-times opti