Regressions on master at commit r15-5015 vs commit r15-5008 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-5015 vs commit r15-5008 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test

Re: [r15-4988 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "__builtin_GOMP_parallel_loop_nonmonotonic_dynamic \\(.*, 16, 0\\);" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:54:40AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 07/11/2024 00:37, haochen.jiang wrote: > > d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e is the first bad commit > > commit d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e > > Author: Andrew Stubbs > > Date: Wed Nov 6 12:26:08 2024 + >

Re: [r15-4988 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "__builtin_GOMP_parallel_loop_nonmonotonic_dynamic \\(.*, 16, 0\\);" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:31:17AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Anyway, I think the attached patch should fix it. It passes on my > configuration, but I don't have a Cascade Lake. You could have tested with whatever you have (if it has AVX) as -march= > OK? Yes, thanks. Jakub

Re: [r15-4988 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "__builtin_GOMP_parallel_loop_nonmonotonic_dynamic \\(.*, 16, 0\\);" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On 07/11/2024 11:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:54:40AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote: On 07/11/2024 00:37, haochen.jiang wrote: d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e is the first bad commit commit d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e Author: Andrew Stubbs Date: Wed

Regressions on master at commit r15-5008 vs commit r15-5007 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-5008 vs commit r15-5007 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:

Re: [r15-4988 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "__builtin_GOMP_parallel_loop_nonmonotonic_dynamic \\(.*, 16, 0\\);" 1 on Linux/x86_64

On 07/11/2024 00:37, haochen.jiang wrote: On Linux/x86_64, d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e is the first bad commit commit d334f729e53867b838e867375b3f475ba793d96e Author: Andrew Stubbs Date: Wed Nov 6 12:26:08 2024 + openmp: Add testcases for omp_max_vf caused FAIL: gcc.d

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-5015 vs commit r15-5009 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-5015 vs commit r15-5009 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "\\+ 16" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "\\+ 16" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/max_vf-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ompexp "\\

Regressions on master at commit r15-5006 vs commit r15-4709 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-5006 vs commit r15-4709 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-77.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "optimized: basic block" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-77.c scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "optimized: basic block" 1 New passes: FAIL:

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9174 vs commit r13-9147 on Linux/i686

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9174 vs commit r13-9147 on Linux/i686 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 -O1 (i

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4991-g69bd93c167fe: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on