Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4685-g091e45b4e97d: FAIL: 1 regressions: 23 improvements on aarch64

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 at 14:17, Sam James via Gcc-regression wrote: > > ci_not...@linaro.org writes: > > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lis

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4685-g091e45b4e97d: FAIL: 1 regressions: 23 improvements on aarch64

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 19:25, Sam James wrote: > > Christophe Lyon writes: > > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 at 14:17, Sam James via Gcc-regression > > wrote: > >> > >> ci_not...@linaro.org writes: > >> > >> > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > >> > your patch(es). Pl

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e: Failure on arm

> On Oct 27, 2024, at 20:40, Li, Pan2 wrote: > > I see, this error may require bootstrap build. There is no aarch64 machine > currently. Let me try to find one somewhere. > You could use one of aarch64 machines in GCC's compiler farm. If that doesn't work -- send me a private email and I'll

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10850 vs commit r14-10840 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-10850 vs commit r14-10840 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-12.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e: Failure on arm

Thanks, let me have a try first and will back to you if still cannot reproduce this. Pan -Original Message- From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 7:39 AM To: Li, Pan2 Cc: Sam James ; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org; Jeff Law ; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; L

Regressions on master at commit r15-4753 vs commit r15-4752 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4753 vs commit r15-4752 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4734-g63b6967b06b: FAIL: 4 regressions on arm

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

Regressions on master at commit r15-4760 vs commit r15-4755 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4760 vs commit r15-4755 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-33.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 3 New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-4740 vs commit r15-4738 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4740 vs commit r15-4738 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-4752 vs commit r15-4747 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4752 vs commit r15-4747 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-4747 vs commit r15-4740 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4747 vs commit r15-4740 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e: Failure on arm

Hi! On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 08:56, Li, Pan2 via Gcc-regression wrote: > > I have a try with below command but get error like "cc1: error: > '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU". > Linux ubuntu-arm 4.15.0-20-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 24 06:16:20 UTC > 2018 aarch64 aarch64

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4685-g091e45b4e97d: FAIL: 1 regressions: 23 improvements on aarch64

Christophe Lyon writes: > On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 at 14:17, Sam James via Gcc-regression > wrote: >> >> ci_not...@linaro.org writes: >> >> > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to >> > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any >> > questions, plea

Regressions on master at commit r15-4764 vs commit r15-4760 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-4764 vs commit r15-4760 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-33.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 3

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9155 vs commit r13-9147 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9155 vs commit r13-9147 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c execution test New passes: