Regressions on native/master at commit r16-2358 vs commit r16-2356 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2358 vs commit r16-2356 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

Regressions on master at commit r16-2357 vs commit r16-2356 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2357 vs commit r16-2356 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10010 vs commit r15-10009 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10010 vs commit r15-10009 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-2334-g9e330977385: 2 regressions on arm

Fixed at r16-2357-g152d4e3cf14fcf On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 18:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Tomasz, > > The new __any_input_iterator type should only be declared for C++20 > and higher, so guarded by __cpp_lib_concepts > > Just checking __cpp_concepts isn't enough, because that's true for > -std

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-2334-g9e330977385: 2 regressions on arm

Tomasz, The new __any_input_iterator type should only be declared for C++20 and higher, so guarded by __cpp_lib_concepts Just checking __cpp_concepts isn't enough, because that's true for -std=c++17 -fconcepts but std::input_iterator isn't defined in that case. On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 17:18, w

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10009 vs commit r15-10003 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10009 vs commit r15-10003 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-2334-g9e330977385: 2 regressions on arm

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In arm-eabi v7-a softfp, after: | commit gcc-16-2334-g9e330977385 | Author: Jonathan Wakely | Date: Thu Jun 5 12:05:19 2025 +0100 | | libstdc++: Add std::inplace

Regressions on native/master at commit r16-2348 vs commit r16-2332 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2348 vs commit r16-2332 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) New passes:

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11898 vs commit r14-11896 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11898 vs commit r14-11896 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c -O0 output pattern test

[ARM EABI] Adjust 'libgomp.c++/target-cdtor-{1,2}.C' for 'targetm.cxx.use_aeabi_atexit' [PR119853, PR119854] (was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-130-gaafe942227b: 10 regressions on arm)

Hi! On 2025-04-26T00:09:21+, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find > some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-16-130-gaafe942227b > | Author: Thomas Schwinge > | Date: Wed

Regressions on master at commit r16-2345 vs commit r16-2332 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-2345 vs commit r16-2332 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/concepts/expression.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) New passes:

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10003 vs commit r15-9997 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-15 at commit r15-10003 vs commit r15-9997 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test New passes: