Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9489 vs commit r13-9488 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_race.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_race.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/simple_stack.c -O0 output pat
Regressions on master at commit r15-8963 vs commit r15-8959 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: g++.dg/strub-internal-pr112938.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times
optimized "={v} \\*j_[0-9][0-9]*(D)" 2
FAIL: g++.dg/strub-internal-pr112938.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times
optim
Regressions on master at commit r15-8455 vs commit r15-8451 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
Regressions on master at commit r15-8933 vs commit r15-8930 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: 25_algorithms/stable_sort/constexpr.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: 25_algorithms/stable_sort/constexpr.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess
errors)
New passes:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/app
ci_not...@linaro.org writes:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
> some details below.
>
> In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after:
> | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81
> | Author: Sam James
> | Date: Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11488 vs commit r14-11483 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O0 output pattern test
F
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
some details below.
In arm-eabi v7-a softfp, after:
| commit gcc-15-9144-gdf225ae29a1
| Author: Christophe Lyon
| Date: Mon Mar 31 19:00:44 2025 +
|
| testsuite: arm: Fix dg-fin
Regressions on master at commit r15-9050 vs commit r15-9048 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
New passes:
FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check
Regressions on master at commit r15-8654 vs commit r15-8643 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/interop-5.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/interop-5.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/re
On 29/03/2025 23:18, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
> some details below.
>
> In master-arm, after:
> | commit gcc-15-8965-gb631ff45f23
> | Author: Richard Earnshaw
> | Date: Wed Mar 26 1
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11496 vs commit r14-11494 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-9069 vs commit r15-9068 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
New passes:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 22:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 14:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 09:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, 17 March 2025, Christophe Lyon
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 21:54, Jonath
13 matches
Mail list logo