Regressions on master at commit r15-1089 vs commit r15-1081 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-1089 vs commit r15-1081 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (t

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-1022-gb05288d1f1e: FAIL: 1 regressions on master-thumb_m0_eabi

Do r15-1050-gfcfce55c85f842ed843cbc4aabe744c6a004dead fix the failure? On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:06 PM ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, >

[r15-1056 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signed-zero.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 4653b682ef161c3c2fc7bf8462b8f9206a1349e6 is the first bad commit commit 4653b682ef161c3c2fc7bf8462b8f9206a1349e6 Author: Richard Biener Date: Tue Mar 5 15:46:24 2024 +0100 Allow single-lane SLP in-order reductions caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signe

[r15-1058 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, c989e59fc99d994159114304d4e715c72bedff0a is the first bad commit commit c989e59fc99d994159114304d4e715c72bedff0a Author: Hongyu Wang Date: Wed Mar 27 10:13:06 2024 +0800 [APX CCMP] Support APX CCMP caused FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L with GC

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-1022-gb05288d1f1e: FAIL: 1 regressions on master-thumb_m0_eabi

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-812-gc71886f2ca2: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-1063 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-1063 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L New passes:

Regressions on master at commit r15-1061 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/i686

Regressions on master at commit r15-1061 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/i686 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION

Regressions on master at commit r15-1061 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-1061 vs commit r15-1056 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c scan-assembler js[ \t].?L New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpe

Regressions on native/master at commit r15-1056 vs commit r15-1049 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r15-1056 vs commit r15-1049 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signed-zero.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signed-zero.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signed-zero.c -f