if i read this correctly it appears that IMPURE/PURE are not the normal pure
attribute used by gcc but some entirely diff attribute specific to FORTANso
people are taking about different things
Original message
From: Steve Kargl
Date: 16/06/2018 17:38 (GMT+00:00)
To: Janus
Heads
Due too -Wabi empty class std::intergal_constant warning compiling
libstdc++/c++/cxx11-shim_facets.cc
Graham
Hi
Fails due to undefind symbols runtime.*
O2 works
16:01 (GMT+00:00)
To: graham stott
Cc: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: bootstrap -O3 failure libgo on x64_86
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 7:12 AM, graham stott via gcc-patches
wrote:
> Hi
> Fails due to undefind symbols runtime.*
> O2 works
I tried my best guess at recreating the pro
stott
Cc: gcc-patches
Subject: Re: bootstrap -O3 failure libgo on x64_86
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 7:12 AM, graham stott via gcc-patches
wrote:
> Hi
> Fails due to undefind symbols runtime.*
> O2 works
I tried my best guess at recreating the problem, and everything worked fine.
Please tell
Original message
From: MCC CS
Date: 02/10/2018 14:38 (GMT+00:00)
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fold more boolean expressions
Thanks a lot!
All
Just a heads the trunk has been broken since about Weds most files fail compare
during bootstrap at O3 but pass at O2
My last succesful boostrap at O3 was Tuesday
I no idea which commit caused it
Graham
O3 bootstraps have started to fail to build since about Thursday.
Due to an internal compiler error when building asan.c in function
asan_emit_stack_protectìon tree-ssa--sccan.c:3396
Graham
Disabling asan the build works
Original message
From: graham stott via gcc-patches
Date: 19/05/2018 10:30 (GMT+00:00)
To: gcc-patches
Subject: O3 bootstraps fail on x86-64
O3 bootstraps have started to fail to build since about Thursday.
Due to an internal compiler
It's --disable-libsanitizer that works not --disable-asan I got that wrong
Original message
From: graham stott via gcc-patches
Date: 19/05/2018 10:30 (GMT+00:00)
To: gcc-patches
Subject: O3 bootstraps fail on x86-64
O3 bootstraps have started to fail to build
Looks like it fixed an GO Libs failure as well I was having
Original message
From: Jeff Law
Date: 29/10/2018 15:56 (GMT+00:00)
To: Segher Boessenkool , Andrew Pinski
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [
On 10/29/18 1:49 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 a
what about testcases? for these
Original message
From: Uros Bizjak
Date: 10/02/2019 12:26 (GMT+00:00)
To: "H.J. Lu"
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/43] i386: Emulate MMX ssse3_pmaddubsw with SSE
On 2/10/19, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Emulate MMX ssse3_pmaddu
All these patches from HJL have no testcases. Are they even sutable for gcc 9
at this stage
Original message
From: Uros Bizjak
Date: 11/02/2019 12:51 (GMT+00:00)
To: "H.J. Lu"
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/43] i386: Emulate MMX vec_dupv2si with SSE
On Mon, Fe
13 matches
Mail list logo
