Committed on trunk, revision 213596
Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597
I made an omission on the first commit. I did not add
the test case and corresponding ChangeLog entry.
Committed as obvious on trunk, revision 213598
Thanks
Edmar
On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
David
Jackub,
Thanks for point this up.
I apologize for the sloppiness.
I fixed and committed the ChangeLogs on the branch, revision 213639
Also fixed the libgcc ChangeLog on trunk. Revision 213640
Edmar
On 08/05/2014 03:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Edmar
Joseph,
Thanks for the tip.
It is likely I need to re-generate the patch (and re-test)
as there had been a lot of activity in the trunk since the original post.
I will do this soon.
Regards,
Edmar
On 05/16/2012 11:10 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Edmar wrote:
I am
Michael,
Thanks for reviewing the patch and all the suggestions.
I have some questions / comments bellow.
Regards,
Edmar
On 05/17/2012 06:16 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
In the patch I minimized the number of changes, while not adding
any new mask to target_flags.
While we may get some bits
will hold until we have a formal
ISA-2.07 document, and we are sure there is no conflict with the patch.
- The rest that will be kept by Freescale.
Thanks,
Edmar
On 05/21/2012 02:51 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Regarding the implementation of popcntb, popcntd, and cmpb. Gcc has
dedicated mas
I have just committed the patch below to add myself to the
write-after-approval section of the MAINTAINERS file.
Thanks,
Edmar
ChangeLog:
2012-05-29 Edmar Wienskoski
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
Index: MAINTAINERS
regression tested for ppc64 target under these conditions:
--enable-checking --disable-decimal-float --enable-languages=all
svn revision number: 187734
We thank in advance for your time to review this patch.
Regards,
Edmar
2012-06-01 Edmar Wienskoski
* config/rs6000/e5500.md: New file
powerpc64 target.
Thanks
Edmar
I committed the following patch to fix the dates
on my own ChangeLog entries
Thanks
Edmar
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 188244)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-2012-06-01 Edmar
The patch I submitted had an omission. I failed to regenerate
rs6000-tables.opt
(Sorry, I misunderstood gcc_update --touch instructions)
OK to commit the update ?
2012-06-05 Edmar Wienskoski
* config/rs6000/rs6000-tables.opt: Regenerated.
On 06/04/2012 08:45 PM, David Edelsohn wrote
Appended popcnt to insn reservation.
- power6.md has different style. Created a separate reservation.
I used instruction latency of 1. Please confirm.
I did not added a store bypass either. Let me know if I should.
Thanks,
Edmar
2012-06-05 Edmar Wienskoski
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (def
On 06/06/2012 08:57 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Edmar wrote:
David, Michael,
Here is the new type "popcnt" patch that I had separated from previous
E5500/E6500 submission, also added the changes suggested by Michael
Meissner (detailed bellow).
I am mi
I am pinging this post:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00430.html
Thanks
Edmar
patch gcc.fix_rnreg4 applies directly to 4.6, 4.7 (1 line offset),
and 4.5 (-632 lines offset)
Thanks,
Edmar
2011-05-23 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com
* gcc.target/powerpc/outofline_rnreg.c: New testcase.
2011-05-23 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com
* rs6000.md
r patience.
In reference to: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Regards,
Edmar
On 05/25/2011 09:43 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:53 PM, edmar wrote:
I completed re-testing everything.
It turns out I cannot reproduce the original error on gcc-4.4 (rev 173968)
So,
eone to commit the patch after
approval, as I have no WAA privileges.
Regards,
Edmar
2011-04-19 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr39902-2.c: Skip testcase for non-dfp
targets.
* gcc.target/powerpc/dfp-dd.c: ditto
* gcc.target/powerpc/df
& ~mask)
There is no boolean simplification possible, and the compiler always
produces
a nand instruction.
The formula is equal to y & (y-1) , maybe the testcase is testing that?
Segher
Ah, yes
A neg/nand/and should be optimized into a sub -1/and.
I will check why this is not happening.
Thanks
Edmar
of the solution is acceptable, I would like to
have it re-tested with the latest in 4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 and get it committed
in all branches.
Thanks
Edmar
2010-06-21 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com
* rs6000.md (save_gpregs_): Replaced pattern with a set
of similar patterns
This time I put them in a tar file, to make sure the mail client don't
mess with them.
(ChangeLog is already inside the patch as well)
After I complete the regression tests, I will post a new version against
latest
subversion revision. Will post it here and on bugzilla.
Thanks,
Edmar
Alan,
The first hunk will match powerpc64 as well.
Edmar
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> Another tweak for little-endian powerpc. Committed revision 198734.
>
> * configure.ac (HAVE_AS_TLS): Enable tests for powerpcle and
> powerpc64le.
>
The e500v2 (SPE) hardware is such that if the address of vector (double world
load / stores) are not double world aligned the instruction will trap.
So this alignment is not optional.
Edmar
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 12:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wr
21 matches
Mail list logo
