Hi,
Resending filename-normalize patch to correct list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
All context, please, see below.
Regards
Vladimir Simonov
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir Simonov
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:52 PM
To: 'Jiri Dobry'; 'gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org'
S
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey.ye...@gmail.com]
>
> There is an issue on file system with symbolic link, like Linux ext2/3. It
> could vitally change behavior of GCC. The issue is described as following.
>
> Such a logic cannot be deduced simple from the name string,
Thank you for review. Please see inline
> From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey.ye...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:36 AM
>
> The macro FILENAME_NORMALIZE doesn't look necessary. I would prefer use
> filename_normalize directly, just as filename_cmp is used in GCC rather than
> FILENAME
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey.ye...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 6:37 AM
>
> I do encourage you to upstream this patch, though I'm not the maintainer of
> libiberty to approve it.
OK. Thank you.
Here it is.
Could you push it to appropriate people?
Atta
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey.ye...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:31 AM
> To: Vladimir Simonov; Ian Lance Taylor; d...@redhat.com
> Vladimir,
>
> I found no more issue on patch itself. But ChangeLogs are missing.
> Please ref
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 6:42 PM
> To: Joey Ye
> Cc: gcc-patches; d...@redhat.com; Vladimir Simonov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [libiberty] MAX_PATH problems with mingw gcc
Jan, thank you
