will never be called.
This patch just move the else condition in make_decl_rtl to make all register
type declaration to get the
same rtx, it this a reasonable fix?
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of T
Ping? Still on the trunk now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:32 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PING v2][Patch]Fix ICE for gcc.dg/noncompile/920507-1.c
>
> Ping 2, and pasted my obser
st follow their pattern to avoid the test case on
target using wrapper.
gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-08-20 Tony Wang
* g++.dg/tls/thread_local6.C: Skip this test case when
target uses dejagnu wrapper.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local6.C
b/gcc/tests
rol whether to split the
section of a function pair into two
part.
gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog:
2014-08-21 Tony Wang
* config/arm/lib1funcs.S (FUNC_START): Add conditional section
redefine for macro L_arm_muldivsf3 and L_arm_muldivdf3
(SYM_END, ARM_SYM_START): Add macros use
-8-21 Tony Wang
* config/arm/ieee754-sf.S: Expose symbols around fragment boundaries as
function symbols.
* config/arm/ieee754-df.S: Same with above
BR,
Tony
libgcc_mul_div_code_size_reduction_2.diff
Description: Binary data
Step 3: Test cases to verify the code size reduction.
gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-08-21 Tony Wang
* gcc.target/arm/size-optimization-ieee-1.c: New test case
* gcc.target/arm/size-optimization-ieee-2.c: New test case
* lib/gcc-dg.exp: Add new function scan-symbol
++-v3/ChangeLog:
2014-08-21 Tony Wang
* testsuite/18_support/nested_exception/62154.cc: Disable
this test case when target don't have atomic buildins.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/nested_exception/62154.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/nested_exception/62
Hi Mike
> Hum, another solution might be to wrap _exit as well. The patch is so simple
> and short, I'll approve the
posted
> patch; it is a nice step forward. I'll let you contemplate if you want to
> try a wrap on _exit.
>
Thanks for your reply, and I also thought of your suggestion to wr
e fix?
gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2014-8-25 Tony Wang
PR target/56846
* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc: Return with CONTINUE_UNWINDING
when meet with the unwind state pattern:
_US_VIRTUAL_UNWIND_FRAME |
_US_FORCE_UNWIND
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:15 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv and
> dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
>
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:15 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv and
> dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
>
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:15 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv and
> dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
>
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 6:33 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'd...@debian.org';
> 'aph-...@littlepinkcloud.com'; Richard Earnshaw; Ramana
> Radhakrishnan
&g
Ping 2?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:02 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping 2?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:02 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping 2?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:02 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
trunk?
gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-09-04 Tony Wang
* gcc.target/arm/xordi3-opt.c: Disable this
test case for thumb1 target.
* gcc.target/arm/iordi3-opt.c: Ditto.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/iordi3-opt.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/iordi3-opt.c
t is reasonable because size of mul is far
smaller than size of div.
ChangLog changes are:
***gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog***
2014-05-28 Tony Wang
* config/arm/lib1funcs.S (FUNC_START): Add conditional section
redefine for macro L_arm_muldivsf3 and L_arm_muldivdf3
Bootstrapped on x86_6
> -Original Message-
> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 4:33 PM
> To: Tony Wang
> Cc: gcc-patches; d...@debian.org; aph-...@littlepinkcloud.com; Richard
> Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan;
> libstd...@gcc.
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Wakely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 5:16 PM
> To: Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Cc: Tony Wang; gcc-patches; d...@debian.org; aph-...@littlepinkclo
Hi there,
This is a updated patch to fix pr56846. Bootstrapped on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and no regression for
regression test on Linux and a cross regression test on arm-none-eabi.
OK for the trunk?
gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2014-09-09 Tony Wang
PR target/56846
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwak...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:40 PM
> To: Tony Wang
> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; gcc-patches; libstd...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch ARM v2] Fix PR target/56846
>
> On 09/09/1
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:15 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for th
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization f
remove the else condition which used to be
the rtx generation part for correctly declared register type, and let all
the register type declaration(no matter it declared correct or not) go
through it and generate the same type of rtx:(reg:SI...).
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-07-29 Tony Wang tony.w.
Ping, any comment and suggestion on this bug fix?
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tony Wang
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:31 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; 'Richard Biener';
30 matches
Mail list logo
