Re: [PATCH] Sanitize block partitioning under -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2013-08-30 Thread Rong Xu
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > Can someone review and ok the attached patch for trunk? It has been > bootstrapped and tested on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu, and tested by > enabling -freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled for a > profiledbootstrap as well. > > (Honza, see mor

Re: [PATCH] Sanitize block partitioning under -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2013-09-26 Thread Rong Xu
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Hi Honza, >> >> I am finally getting back to working on this after a few weeks of >> working on some other priorities. > > I am also trying to return to this, so good timming ;) > Martin has got smaller C++ programs (Inkscape) to not touch col

[google gcc-4_8] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-09-26 Thread Rong Xu
. This patch fixes this problem. -Rong 2013-09-26 Rong Xu * ipa-inline-analysis.c (estimate_function_body_sizes): fix the size estimation for builtin_expect. Index: ipa-inline-analysis.c === --- ipa-inline

[google gcc-4_8] alternate hirate for builtin_expert

2013-09-26 Thread Rong Xu
2013-09-26 Rong Xu * params.def (DEFPARAM): New. * params.def: New. * predict.c (tree_predict_by_opcode): Alternate probablity hirate for builtin_expect. Index: params.def === --- params.def

Re: [PATCH] Sanitize block partitioning under -freorder-blocks-and-partition

2013-09-26 Thread Rong Xu
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> > As for COMDAT merging, i would like to see the patch. I am experimenting >> > now with a patch to also privatize COMDATs during -fprofile-generate to >> > avoid problems with lost profiles mentioned above. >> > >> >> Do you mean you privati

Re: [google gcc-4_8] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
roduce >>> an extra relation expr which has non-zero size/time. The end result >>> is: for w/ and w/o builtin_expect, we have different size/time estimation >>> for early inlining. >>> >>> This patch fixes this problem. >>> >>> -Rong

Re: [google gcc-4_8] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
d result >> is: for w/ and w/o builtin_expect, we have different size/time estimation >> for early inlining. >> >> This patch fixes this problem. >> >> -Rong > >> 2013-09-26 Rong Xu >> >> * ipa-inline-analysis.c (estimate_function_body_siz

Re: [google/4_8] Disable -g/-gmlt during LIPO instrumentation

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
I don't quite understand here. We use the profile-generate memory consumption to estimate the profile use memory consumption. we still have -g/-gmlt in profile-use compilation. Will this change effectively under estimate the memory use in the use phrase? -Rong On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Te

Re: [google gcc-4_8] alternate hirate for builtin_expert

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
ought to get analyze_brprob working again. It was always > useful to get such a data. >> >> >> This patch sets the alternate hirate probability for >> builtin_expert >> to 90%. With the alternate hirate, we measured performance >>

[PATCH] alternative hirate for builtin_expert

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, Current default probability for builtin_expect is 0.9996. This makes the freq of unlikely bb very low (4), which suppresses the inlining of any calls within those bb. We used FDO data to measure the branch probably for the branch annotated with builtin_expert. For google internal benchmar

[PATCH] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-09-27 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce an extra relation expr which has non-zero size/time. The end result is: for w/ and w/o builtin_expect, we have different size/time estimation for inlining. This p

Re: [PATCH] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-10-01 Thread Rong Xu
ping. On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call > stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce > an extra relation expr which has non-zero size/time. The end result >

Re: [PATCH] alternative hirate for builtin_expert

2013-10-01 Thread Rong Xu
ping. On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > > > Current default probability for builtin_expect is 0.9996. > This makes the freq of unlikely bb very low (4), which > suppresses the inlining of any calls within those bb. > > We used FDO data to meas

Re: [google 4.7] fix line number checksum mismatch in lipo-use (issue6566044)

2012-09-28 Thread Rong Xu
Comments are inlined. Attached is the new patch. Thanks, -Rong On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is for google branches only. >> It fix the lino number checksum mis

Re: [PATCH] alternative hirate for builtin_expert

2013-10-02 Thread Rong Xu
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > Current default probability for builtin_expect is 0.9996. >> > This makes the freq of unlikely bb very low (4), which >> > suppresses the inlining of any calls within those bb. >> > >> > We used FDO data to measure t

Re: [PATCH] fix size_estimation for builtin_expect

2013-10-02 Thread Rong Xu
attached the new patch. OK for check in? On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > builtin_expect should be a NOP in size_estimation. Indeed, the call >> > stmt itself is 0 weight in size and time. But it may introduce >> > an extra relation expr which has non-zero siz

Re: [PATCH] alternative hirate for builtin_expert

2013-10-02 Thread Rong Xu
Here is the new patch. Honaz: Could you take a look? Thanks, -Rong On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. This is much cleaner than to use binary parameter. >> >> Just want to make sure I understand it correctly about the orginal hitrate: >> you want to

Re: [PATCH] alternative hirate for builtin_expert

2013-10-04 Thread Rong Xu
Radhakrishnan wrote: > On 10/02/13 23:49, Rong Xu wrote: >> >> Here is the new patch. Honaz: Could you take a look? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Rong >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks

[PATCH] increase builtin_expert probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, An earlier patch (r203167) changed the default probability for builtin_expect to 90%. It does not work properly for the following case: while (__builin_expect (expr, 1)) { } W/o builtin_expect, the exit probability is 9% while w/ builtin_expect, the exit probability is 10%. It seems to

[google gcc-4_8] increase builtin_expect probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
The trunk version of this patch is submitted for review. David: can we have this patch for google/gcc-4_8 branch first? It tested with regression and google internal benchmarks. Thanks, -Rong 2013-10-11 Rong Xu * predict.c (tree_predict_by_opcode): Bump the estimiated

Re: [google gcc-4_8] increase builtin_expect probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
I want to differentiate the cases w/o and w/ builtin. If I take the max, they will be the same (91%). -Rong On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Why this 'percent += 4' instead of taking the max? > > David > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Ron

Re: [google gcc-4_8] increase builtin_expect probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
ok. that makes sense. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Should it be max + some_delta then? > > David > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> I want to differentiate the cases w/o and w/ builtin. >> If I take the max

Re: [google gcc-4_8] increase builtin_expect probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
hitrate = REG_BR_PROB_BASE; + break; +} +} +} +} + predict_edge (then_edge, PRED_BUILTIN_EXPECT, hitrate); } /* Try "pointer heuristic." A comparison ptr == 0 is predicted as false. On Fri, Oc

Re: [PATCH] increase builtin_expert probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
Attached is the patchset 2. It takes the max to two hitrates then does the incremental. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > An earlier patch (r203167) changed the default probability for > builtin_expect to 90%. > It does not work properly for the

[google gcc-4_8] LIPO: insert static vars to varpool

2013-10-14 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, For google gcc-4_8 branch only. This is fixes the NULL pointer dereference in copy_tree_r due to empty varpool_node returned. Passed the ICE compilation. Other tests are ongoing. Thanks, -Rong 2013-10-14 Rong Xu * cp/semantics.c (finish_compound_literal): Put static var to

Re: [GOOGLE] Check if varpool node exist for decl before checking if it's from auxiliary module.

2013-10-22 Thread Rong Xu
seems fine to me for google branches. -Rong On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Dehao Chen wrote: > This is fixing a LIPO bug when there -fexception is on. > > When compilation is finished, compile_file calls > dw2_output_indirect_constants, which may generate decls like > DW.ref.__gxx_personality

[google gcc-4_8] write ggc_memory to gcda file

2013-10-25 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch writes out ggc_memory to gcda files. Google branches only. Test is ongoing. OK to check-in after test passes? -Rong 2013-10-25 Rong Xu * contrib/profile_tool (ModuleInfo): write out ggc_memory to gcda file. * gcc/gcov-io.c (gcov_read_module_info): Ditto

[RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-01 Thread Rong Xu
libgcov.c is the main file to generate libgcov.a. This single source generates 21 object files and then archives to a library. These objects are of very different purposes but they are in the same file guarded by various macros. The source file becomes quite large and its readability becomes very l

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-04 Thread Rong Xu
BTW, this part of patch only does the re-factoring work. I haven't finished the porting of profile-tool part of patch to the trunk. They should be in a separate patch anyway. -Rong On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Honza, Thanks for the comments! > Attached is the patc

Re: [PATCH] Conditional count update for fast coverage test in multi-threaded programs

2013-12-20 Thread Rong Xu
-3.34%+5.75% -- On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Rong Xu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: >>>>

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2014-01-08 Thread Rong Xu
gcov_pow2_profiler.o (ex > ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a) > 115 0 0 115 73 _gcov_one_value_profiler.o (ex > ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a) > 122 0 0 122 7a _gcov_indirect_call_profiler.o (ex > ./lib64/

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2014-01-08 Thread Rong Xu
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: >>> >>> #ifdef L_gcov_merge_ior >>> /* The profile merging function that just adds the counters. It is given >>> - an array COUNTERS of N_COUNTERS old counters and it reads the same >>> number >>> - of counters from the gcov file.

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2014-01-08 Thread Rong Xu
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> @@ -325,6 +311,9 @@ static struct gcov_summary all_prg; >> #endif >> /* crc32 for this program. */ >> static gcov_unsigned_t crc32; >> +/* Use this summary checksum rather the computed one if the value is >> + *non-zero. */ >> +static

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2014-01-09 Thread Rong Xu
My bad. Thanks for the fix! -Rong On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>>> @@ -325,6 +311,9 @@ static struct gcov_summary all_prg; >>>> #endi

[google][gcc-4_9] Remove unused key field in gcov_fn_info

2015-09-29 Thread Rong Xu
7;key' field in gcov_fn_info to reduce the instrumented objects size. 2015-09-29 Rong Xu * gcc/coverage.c (build_fn_info_type): Remove 'key' field. (build_fn_info): Ditto. (coverage_obj_fn): Ditto. * libgcc/libgcov.h (struct gcov_fn_info): Ditto.

Re: [google][gcc-4_9] Remove unused key field in gcov_fn_info

2015-09-29 Thread Rong Xu
fi_ptr) > length = GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION_LENGTH; > - else > -length = 0; > } > > The removal of 'else' path seems wrong. > > David > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thi

[google][gcc-4_9] encode and compress cc1 option strings in gcov_module_info

2015-10-05 Thread Rong Xu
; gcov_unsigned_t cc1_uncompressed_strlen; char *saved_cc1_strings; The new saved_cc1_strings are zlib compressed string. Tested with google internal benchmarks. Thanks, -Rong 2015-10-05 Rong Xu * gcc/Makefile.in (gcov-dump): link with zlib (gcov-tool): Ditto. * gcc/auto-profile.c

Re: [google][gcc-4_9] encode and compress cc1 option strings in gcov_module_info

2015-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
> + /* cc1_uncompressed_strlen field */ >field = build_decl (BUILTINS_LOCATION, FIELD_DECL, >NULL_TREE, get_gcov_unsigned_t ()); >DECL_CHAIN (field) = fields; >fields = field; > > > Why do we need to store uncompressed string leng

Re: [google][gcc-4_9] encode and compress cc1 option strings in gcov_module_info

2015-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: >>>unsigned ggc_memory = gcov_read_unsigned (); >>> + unsigned marker = 0, len = 0, k; >>> + char **string_array, *saved_cc1_strings; &g

Re: [google][gcc-4_9] encode and compress cc1 option strings in gcov_module_info

2015-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
Here is the patch set 2 that integrates David's comments. Note that this uses the combined strlen (i.e. encoding compressed and uncompressed strlen into one gcov_unsigned_t). Testing is ongoing. -Rong On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Rong Xu wrote: > It's 1:3 to 1:4 in the prog

[google gcc-4_9] Fix bad LIPO profile produced by gcov-tool

2015-12-01 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch fixes the issue when using gcov-tool to merge LIPO profiles after we compressing the module infomration . We should not decompress the string as the compressed string should be written directly to the profile later. Tested with some LIPO profiles. Thanks, -Rong 2015-12-01 Rong

Re: [google gcc-4_9] Fix bad LIPO profile produced by gcov-tool

2015-12-01 Thread Rong Xu
ath before. > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This patch fixes the issue when using gcov-tool to merge LIPO profiles >> after we compressing the module infomration . We should not decompress >> the string as the compress

[patch] make gcov-tool build configurable and fix mingw build issue

2014-08-13 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch makes gcov-tool build configurable. A new configure option --disable-gcov-tool is added to disable the build. It also fixes some build issues for mingw. Tested with regression and bootstrap. mingw test is ongoing. OK to check in if mingw build passes? Thanks, -Rong gcov_tool_

[PATCH] PR61889

2014-09-02 Thread Rong Xu
This patch makes the build of gcov-tool configurable. It checks if ftw.h is available. For mingw build, it provides ftw functionality by using FindFirstFile/FindNextFile/FindClose API. Tested with and without --disable-gcov-tool. Thanks, -Rong 2014-09-02 Rong Xu * gcc/Makefile.in

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-08 Thread Rong Xu
w source and weight parameter -- especially the weight. Will do. > 3) How do you deal with integer overflow ? This is good question. gcvo_type is (typically) long long. I thought the count value will not be nearly close to the max of long long. (We did see overflow in compiler, but that'

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-08 Thread Rong Xu
at 10:48 AM, Rong Xu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> in libgcov-driver.c >> >>> /* Flag when the profile has already been dumped via __gcov_dump(). */ >>> static int gcov_dump_complete; >> >

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-08 Thread Rong Xu
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Xinliang David Li >> wrote: >>> in libgcov-driver.c >>> >>>> /* Flag when the profile has already been

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-08 Thread Rong Xu
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Xinliang David Li >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:2

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-11 Thread Rong Xu
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> 2013-11-04 Rong Xu >> >> * libgcc/libgcov.c: Delete as part of re-factoring. >> * libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c (__gcov_interval_profiler): Moved from >> libgcov.c >>

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-11 Thread Rong Xu
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Here is the patch that includes profile-tool. >> Profile-tool now has two functions: merge and rewrite. I'll add diff later. >> >> Compiler is tested with spec2006 and profiledbootstrap. >> profile-tool is tested with spec2006 profiles. > > Hi

Re: [PATCH] Time profiler - phase 1

2013-11-12 Thread Rong Xu
A question about the newly added global variable function_counter. Does it have to be a global? Can I make it a file static, within macro L_gcov_time_profiler? I don't find a use other than in __gcov_time_profiler(). thanks, -Rong On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 11 N

Re: [PATCH] Time profiler - phase 1

2013-11-12 Thread Rong Xu
Thanks. I'll have this change included in my libgcov.c re-re-factoring patch. -Rong On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi Rong, > you are right, that's the only usage and so that you can declare it > static. > > Thank you, > Martin > >

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-12 Thread Rong Xu
function to libgcov-interface.c and made it under L_gcov_flush (newly added). So if you need this function, you have to enable L_gcov_flush in the libgcc/Makefile.in. Thanks, -Rong On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Rong Xu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >&

Re: Fix summary generation with fork

2013-11-19 Thread Rong Xu
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch fixes problem we noticed with Martin Liska where gcov_dump is > called > several times per execution of firefox (on each fork and exec). This causes > runs to be large and makes functions executed once per program to be > co

Re: atomic update of profile counters (issue7000044)

2013-11-19 Thread Rong Xu
statically link libatomic.a. Andrew: Do you have any suggestion? Or should we let the user link to libatomic.a if the builtins are not expanded? Is this OK for trunk? Thanks, -Rong On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Function __gcov_indirect_call_profiler_atomic (which con

Re: atomic update of profile counters (issue7000044)

2013-11-20 Thread Rong Xu
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I merged this old patch with current trunk. I also make the following changes >> (1) not using weak references. Now every *profile_atomic() has it&

Re: atomic update of profile counters (issue7000044)

2013-11-20 Thread Rong Xu
ofile-arcs|fprofile-generate*|coverage:-lgcov\ + " GCOV_ATOMIC_SPEC "} " SANITIZER_SPEC " \ %{!nostdlib:%{!nodefaultlibs:%(link_ssp) %(link_gcc_c_sequence)}}\ %{!nostdlib:%{!nostartfiles:%E}} %{T*} }}" On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Joseph S. Myers

Re: atomic update of profile counters (issue7000044)

2013-11-20 Thread Rong Xu
OK. Sorry for miss-reading the message. In that case, linking in libatomic becomes a separate issue. We don't need to touch gcc.c in this patch. Thanks, -Rong On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Joseph and

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool

2013-11-20 Thread Rong Xu
-dump'. > > David > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> This is the new patch for gcov-tool (previously profile-tool). >> >> Honza: can you comment on the new merge interface? David posted some >> comments in an earli

[PATCH] Conditional count update for fast coverage test in multi-threaded programs

2013-11-21 Thread Rong Xu
counters. The improvement can be significant for highly threaded programs -- we are seeing 7x speedup in coverage test run for some non-trivial google applications. Tested with bootstrap. Thanks, -Rong 2013-11-21 Rong Xu * gcc/doc/invoke.texi (coverage-exec_once): Add document

Re: [PATCH] Conditional count update for fast coverage test in multi-threaded programs

2013-11-22 Thread Rong Xu
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch injects a condition into the instrumented code for edge >> counter update. The counter value will not be updated after reaching >> va

Re: [PATCH] Conditional count update for fast coverage test in multi-threaded programs

2013-11-25 Thread Rong Xu
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>&

[PATCH] Indirect-call topn targets profiler (instrumentation)

2014-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, I ported the indirect-call topn target profile from google branch. It implements the algorithm described in "Value profiling and optimization" by Brad Calder and Peter Feller. This patch is about the instrumentation. When --param=indir-call-topn-profile=1 is specified, we will use indirection-

[PATCH] Indirect-call topn targets profiler (runtime)

2014-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, I ported the indirect-call topn target profile from google branch. It implements the algorithm described in "Value profiling and optimization" by Brad Calder and Peter Feller. This patch is the runtime support. Tested with gcc regression tests and the instrumentation patch (in a separated pat

Re: [PATCH] Indirect-call topn targets profiler (instrumentation)

2014-10-06 Thread Rong Xu
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> > Rong, >> > Would be possible to use topn profiler to get resonale histograms for >> > switch >> > expansion, too? In that case it may make sense to have value version of >> > it as w

[PATCH] add overlap function to gcov-tool

2014-10-07 Thread Rong Xu
performance triaging and reducing the fdo training set size (where similar inputs can be pruned). Tested with spec2006 profiles. Thanks, -Rong 2014-10-07 Rong Xu * gcc/gcov-tool.c (profile_overlap): New driver function to compute profile overlap

Re: [PATCH] add overlap function to gcov-tool

2014-10-08 Thread Rong Xu
no file to reconstruct the CFG. That needs some work. -Rong > > Honza >> >> The resulting score is a value ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 where 0.0 means >> no match and 1.0 mean a perfect match. >> >> This tool can be used in performance triaging and reducing the fdo &g

[PATCH] move gcov-dump functionality to gcov-tool

2014-10-08 Thread Rong Xu
Hi This patch moves the gcov-dump functionality to gcov-tool (which is installed by default). The options are exactly the same as before. The difference is instead of calling "gcov-dump ...", we now call "gcov-tool dump ..." gcov-dump is useful in debugging fdo issues. I think it would be very he

[PATCH PR63581] Fix undefined references in debug_info

2014-10-17 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, The attached patch fixes PR63581. The diagnosis is in the bug report. Google ref b/17759776. Tested with bootstrap and regression. Thanks, -Rong 63581_patch Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH PR63581] Fix undefined references in debug_info

2014-10-17 Thread Rong Xu
(working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ +2014-10-17 + * g++.dg/tree-prof/pr63581.C: New test. + 2014-10-17 Marek Polacek PR c/63543 On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch fixes PR63581. The diagnosis is in the bug report. > Google ref b/17759776. >

[google gcc-4_9] make ifunc support available for BIONIC

2014-10-27 Thread Rong Xu
ifunc support is hard-coded as false for BIONIC. This patch removes this check and let configure decide whether it should have ifunc support. Thanks, -Rong ifunc_diff Description: Binary data

Re: [Google/4_8] Reduce memory overhead of LIPO COMDAT fixups

2014-06-05 Thread Rong Xu
This patch looks good to me. -Rong On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > (cc'ing a few additional people to help with review as David is out > and I'm not sure Rong is available) > > This patch greatly reduces the memory overhead of the new COMDAT fixup > analysis, by changing

Re: [Google] Fix AFDO early inline ICEs due to DFE

2014-06-12 Thread Rong Xu
This looks fine to me. -Rong On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > These two patches fix multiple ICE that occurred due to DFE being > recently enabled after AutoFDO LIPO linking. > > Passes regression and internal testing. Ok for Google/4_8? > > Teresa > > 2014-06-12 Teresa

[google gcc-4.9] FDO build for linux kernel

2014-11-13 Thread Rong Xu
Here is patch that ports our work on FDO linux kernel build support to gcc-4_9. With this patch, kernel will use the libgcov functions to dump the gcda files. This patch also enables LIPO build. But the module grouping is not computed online. We will use gcov-tool to do this offline. Tested with

[PATCH] multi-target indirect-call promotion

2014-11-17 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch implements the use phase of indirect-call-topn-profile that promotes multiple targets of indirect-calls. It addresses pr/45631. The main idea is to use current speculation framework, with a vector of direct edges (sorted by the probability). The trick part is the we have multiple

[google gcc-4_7] coverage callback instrumentation (issue9630043)

2013-05-21 Thread Rong Xu
. It disables the may-uninit check if the warning will not be emitted. Tested with bootstrap, regressions test and google internal benchmarks. Thanks, -Rong 2013-05-21 Rong Xu * gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c (gate_warn_uninitialized): Disable if may-uninit warning will not emitted

[google gcc-4_8] not mapping debug expr to a deleted varpool node (issue9760043)

2013-05-24 Thread Rong Xu
This patch fixes a bug in exposed in LIPO build (ICE in copy tree node). Tested with bookstrap and google internal benchmarks. -Rong 2013-05-24 Rong Xu Google ref b/8963414. * gcc/tree-inline.c (add_local_variables): Not map to deleted debug expression. Index: gcc

[google gcc-4_9] fix undefined references in debug_info

2014-10-03 Thread Rong Xu
to it. Tested with problematic file and regression test. Trunk may also have the same issue, but I need to work on a testcase. Thanks, -Rong 2014-10-02 Rong Xu * gcc/cfgrtl.c (emit_barrier_after_bb): Append footer instead of overwriting. Index: gcc/cfg

[google gcc-4_8] fix bad merge in r199218

2013-06-19 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch fixes a bad merge in r199218. Removing cgraph noded in early-ipa should be allowed. Otherwise, we got ICE in tree-eipa_sra with -freorder-funtions=callgraph (without -fripa) Tested with regressions and google banchmarks. Thanks, -Rong patch.diff Description: Binary data

Re: [Google] Fix profiledbootstrap failure

2013-07-30 Thread Rong Xu
We have seen the issue before. It does fail the profile boostrap as it reads a wrong gcda file. I thought it had been fixed. (The fix was as David mentioned, setting the default value of the parameter to 0). -Rong On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > I need to understand

Re: [Google] Fix profiledbootstrap failure

2013-07-30 Thread Rong Xu
, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Ok. Rong, can you help commit the parameter default setting patch? > > thanks, > > David > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> We have seen the issue before. It does fail the profile boostrap as it >> reads a wrong gc

[google gcc-4_8] Force cmd-line match for option -ansi in LIPO use

2013-07-30 Thread Rong Xu
The following patch forces the command line match for -ansi option in LIPO use build. Otherwise, it gets various undefined symbol errors. This is exposed in LIPO random grouping test. Tested with google internal benchmarks and gcc regression test. 2013-07-30 Rong Xu * gcc/coverage.c

[Google] fix a bug in lipo varpool node linking

2013-08-16 Thread Rong Xu
This patch fixed a bug in lipo varpool node linking. C++ FE drops the initializer if it's not used in this TU. For current varpool linking may resolve the varpool node to the one with null initializer. -Rong Index: l-ipo.c === ---

[google gcc-4_7] new module grouping method (issue7393058)

2013-02-25 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This is the patch that implements a new module grouping. It's based on module level graph and simple inclusion based algorithm. Tests are ongoing with google internal benchmarks and spec2k, spec2k6. Thanks, -Rong 2013-02-25 Rong Xu * libgcc/dyn-ipa.c (struct dyn_cgraph)

[google gcc-4_7] change LIPO default module grouping algorithm (issue7490043)

2013-03-05 Thread Rong Xu
internal benchmarks. -Rong 2013-03-05 Rong Xu * libgcc/dyn-ipa.c (__gcov_lipo_weak_inclusion): changed from __gcov_lipo_strict_inclusion. (init_dyn_call_graph): Ditto. (ps_add_auxiliary): Ditto. (modu_edge_add_auxiliary): Ditto. * gcc/tree-profile.c

[google gcc-4_7] offline profile merge tool (issue8508048)

2013-04-08 Thread Rong Xu
that contain profile data to merge. Histogram is recomputed (i.e. preicise). Module grouping information in LIPO is approximation. Thanks, -Rong 2013-04-08 Rong Xu * contrib/profile_merge.py: An offline profile merge tool. Index: contrib/profile_merge.py

[google gcc-4_7] offline profile merge (patchset 2) (issue8508048)

2013-04-08 Thread Rong Xu
Revised copyright info. -Rong 2013-04-08 Rong Xu * contrib/profile_merge.py: An offline profile merge tool. Index: contrib/profile_merge.py === --- contrib/profile_merge.py(revision 0) +++ contrib/profile_merge.py

[google gcc-4_7] offline profile tool (patchset 3) (issue8508048)

2013-04-09 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, Patch set 3 for offline profile merge tool. (1) Rename to profile_tool for future function expansion. (2) Install to bin/ directory for easy user access. Thanks, -Rong 2013-04-09 Rong Xu * gcc/Makefile.in: Install profile_tool to bin directory. * contrib/profile_tool

[google gcc-4_7] offline profile tool (patchset 4) (issue8508048)

2013-04-10 Thread Rong Xu
This patch integrated Martin's comments. -Rong 2013-04-10 Rong Xu * contrib/profile_tool: New * gcc/Makefile.in (GCC_INSTALL_NAME): install profile_tool Index: contrib/profile_tool === --- contrib/profile

[google gcc-4_8] fix lipo ICE

2014-05-08 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch fixed lipo ICE triggered by an out-of-bound access. This is google specific patch and tested with bootstrap and the program exposed the issue. Thanks, -Rong 2014-05-08 Rong Xu * tree-inline.c (add_local_variables): Check if the debug_expr is a decl_node

[google gcc-4_8] LIPO: check the incompatibility of use and saved command line

2014-05-12 Thread Rong Xu
that checks b/w saved command lines. Tested with the program exposed this issue and internal benchmarks. This check never failed for instrumentation based lipo in the test. Thanks, -Rong 2014-05-12 Rong Xu * coverage.c (struct string_hasher): Use const char

Re: [Patch] Avoid gcc_assert in libgcov

2014-05-22 Thread Rong Xu
I think these asserts will be used by gcov-tool. So I prefer to change them to gcov_nonruntime_assert(). I'll merge them in my new gcov-tool patch before submitting (waiting for honaz's ok). Thanks, -Rong On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:41 PM,

Re: [google gcc-4_8] backport libgcov re-factoring patches from trunk

2014-01-15 Thread Rong Xu
oogle/main so that a better diff can be done > 4) libdriver-profiler.c -- make the function ordering the same as in > google/main would be helpful. sure. I'll do this two items. Will send an updated patch soon. > > thanks, > > David > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Rong

Re: [PATCH] offline gcda profile processing tool

2014-01-16 Thread Rong Xu
Ping. -Rong On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > This patch implements gcov-tool, a offline profile processing tool. > This version supports merging two profiles with weights, and scaling > the profile with a floating-point / fraction weight. > > Earl

Re: [google gcc-4_8] port gcov-tool to gcc-4_8

2014-01-17 Thread Rong Xu
so some comments needs > to be added in dyn-ipa.c to make sure the value should be doubly > updated). > > David > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch port the gcov-tool work to google/gcc-4_8 branches. >> >>

[Google gcc-4_8] always emit __gcov_get_profile_prefix when linking libgcov.a

2014-01-23 Thread Rong Xu
Hi, This patch is for google/gcc-4_8 branch. It fixes a regression in earlier libgcov refactoring. Thanks, -Rong 2014-01-23 Rong Xu * libgcov-driver.c (__gcov_get_profile_prefix): Always emit this function. Index: libgcov-driver.c

[google gcc-4_8] gcov-tool: some new LIPO supports.

2014-01-29 Thread Rong Xu
-time module grouping computation and reuses the one comes with the profiles (which is user editable). Tested with profiles from google internal benchmarks. -Rong 2014-01-29 Rong Xu * gcc/gcov-tool.c (mod_name_id): New type of the hashtable entry. (mod_name_id_htab_hash): Hash

Re: [google gcc-4_8] gcov-tool: some new LIPO supports.

2014-01-30 Thread Rong Xu
Comments are inlined. New patch attached to this email. -Rong On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Rong Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The attached patch adds some new features to gcov-tool. It aims to >> rewrite LIPO

Re: [google gcc-4_8] gcov-tools: minor fix for broken build for arm

2014-01-31 Thread Rong Xu
Thanks for catching this, and the fix. OK for google branch. -Rong On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Hán Shěn (沈涵) wrote: > Hi Rong, while building for arm toolchain on chromeos, GCOV_LOCKED is > not defined, which leads to redefinition of cs_all, this is observed > on google/gcc-4_8 branch. > >

Re: [google gcc-4_8] gcov-tool: some new LIPO supports.

2014-02-04 Thread Rong Xu
Here is the revised patch that integrates Teresa' comments. Ok for checking in? -Rong On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Comments are inlined. New patch attached to this email. > > -Rong > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Xinliang David Li > wrote: >

  1   2   >