Hi all!
Situation from PR was already caught earlier locally. So, I've just extracted
appropriate part, it also slightly modifies loop checks related to
non-single-set instructions.
Patch (attached) was successfully bootstrapped/regtested on aarch64-linux on
all active branches (8-12) with mod
This obvious patch fixes indentation in PR90001-related code.
Committed as r10-7106.
Roman
--
gcc/ChangeLog:
* ddg.c (create_ddg): Fix intendation.
(set_recurrence_length): Likewise.
(create_ddg_all_sccs): Likewise.
diff --git a/gcc/ddg.c b/gcc/ddg.c
index aae92adf89a..ca
This patch marks find_simple_exit function as static.
Committed as r10-7107 after successful bootstrap on x86_64 and powerpc64le.
Roman
--
Function 'find_simple_exit' is used only from loop-iv.c
In 2004-2006 it was also used in predict.c, but since r118694
(992c31e62304ed5d34247dbdef2db276d08fac0
Hi all!
12.03.2020 6:17, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
>> perspective.
>>
>> But right now I see that when I enable -fmodulo-sched by default, powerpc64le
>> bootstrap give comparison failure as of r10-7056.
>>
>> Comparing stages 2 and
Hi,
Christophe Lyon wrote 2020-03-27 19:53:
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 11:56, Roman Zhuykov via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Hi all!
12.03.2020 6:17, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
>> perspective.
>>
>> But rig
Hi all!
Same patch attached with commit message and inlined below. It was successfully
reg-strapped on aarch64-linux. Planning also to briefly check amd64 build
before push.
Pushing in a few days if no objections. Any opinion about backports?
Roman
--
modulo-sched: Carefully process loop