On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:05 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Sorry for the slow reply.
Not a problem at all. Thank you for responding!
> Pip Cet via Gcc-patches writes:
> > I'm working on the AVR cc0 -> CCmode conversion (bug#92729). One
> > problem is that the cmpe
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:12 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 12:42 +0000, Pip Cet via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I've bootstrapped and run the test suite with the patch, without
> > differences.
> So it looks like Richard has given you some feedback and you'v
I'm working on the AVR cc0 -> CCmode conversion (bug#92729). One
problem is that the cmpelim pass is currently very strict in requiring
insns of the form
(parallel [(set (reg:SI) (op:SI ... ...))
(clobber (reg:CC REG_CC))])
when in fact AVR's insns often have the form
(parallel [(set
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:02 PM Tom Tromey wrote:
> This patch changes gcc's spell checker to prefer simple case changes
> when possible.
>
> I tested this using the self-tests. A new self-test is also included.
I think that's great, but it should be mentioned in the comment that
the distance fu
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:21 PM Pip Cet wrote:
> IIRC, minimum string alignment does not satisfy the triangle
> inequality anyway, so test_metric_conditions should probably not
> pretend to test it...
I did remember correctly, though of course that should have been
"optimal string alignment" :-).
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:06 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 13:40 +0000, Pip Cet via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I think we should just omit the triangle inequality test from the
> > self-test, as in the attached patch.
>
> I like the idea,
Thanks!
> but ca
David Malcolm writes:
> On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 18:51 +, Pip Cet wrote:
>> How's this?
>
> Thanks; looks good to me. Hopefully this doesn't clash with Tom's
> patch.
It doesn't, but I hope I got the commit message right this time.
(I don't have git access, so if someone could commit this if
