>
> And based on the history of RISC-V port
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2017-January/222595.html) the process
> for a new port seems:
>
> 1. Get a permission from the Steering Committee.
> 2. Add one or two port maintainers into MAINTAINERS file.
> 3. Now the technical reviewing of the pat
> > And based on the history of RISC-V port
> > (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2017-January/222595.html) the process
> > for a new port seems:
> >
> > 1. Get a permission from the Steering Committee.
> > 2. Add one or two port maintainers into MAINTAINERS file.
> > 3. Now the technical reviewin
ping ?
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:50 PM chenglulu wrote:
>
> The LoongArch architecture (LoongArch) is an Instruction Set
> Architecture (ISA) that has a Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC)
> style.
> The documents are on
> https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/README-EN.html
>
>
ping?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:12 AM wrote:
>
> From: Chenghua Xu
>
> Hi, all:
>
> This is the v7 version of LoongArch Port. Please review.
>
> We know it is stage4, I think it is ok for a new prot.
> The kernel side upstream waiting for a approval by gcc side,
> if it is blocked by stage4, a
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your review.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:30 PM Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2022, at 5:49 AM, chenglulu wrote:
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >
> >* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-rom.C: Add build options for LoongArch.
> >* g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrmem.C
> > This patch reduce reservation of model do not more than 10 cycles. The
> > memory of genautomata down to 1GB.
>
> How bad is the memory consumption before this change?
>
almost 2.4GB.
see bugzilla comment #4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510#c4
Looks good to me, but I have no right to approve.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:17 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>
> Ping patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573213.html
>
> Status update: bootstrapped with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O3 -mmsa -mloongson-mmi"
> (it failed without the patch), and
>From 589dbe8a1c2397bfafefa4e84abe5ec6e6798928 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Pinski
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:42:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix __builtin_longjmp (PR 64242)
The problem here is mips has its own builtin_longjmp
pattern and it was not fixed when expand_builtin_longjmp
w
ping?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 2:27 PM Paul Hua wrote:
>
> From 589dbe8a1c2397bfafefa4e84abe5ec6e6798928 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrew Pinski
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:42:57 +
> Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix __builtin_longjmp (PR 64242)
>
> The problem here is mips has its own builti
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for your suggestion, Those macros can be removed, we will send
the v4 version soon.
Are there any problems in this series of patches?
In other words, What conditions are required for LoongArch back-end merged?
By the way, We are preparing the LoongArch machine to send to Cfarm
Hi Ruoyao,
Thank you for your attention.
> GCC 12 development cycle is at stage 3 (general bugfixing) now. So a
> new port have to wait until stage 1 of GCC 13 begins (in mid 2022, I
> guess).
I know it is stage3, but we are a new target, it's ok for GCC 12.
Hi all,
Ping?
By the way, the LoongArch machine is already connected to the Cfarm
and will be announced soon.
You can login through ssh.
ssh -l your-cfarm-user-name -p 25469 114.242.206.180
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 5:28 PM chenglulu wrote:
>
> The LoongArch architecture (LoongArch) is an Instru
12 matches
Mail list logo
