This is the original binutils bugzilla report,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28509
And this is the first version of the proposed binutils patch,
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-November/118398.html
After applying the binutils patch, I get the the unexpected error
gcc/
* configure: Regenerated.
* configure.ac: If ifunc was supported in the binutils for
linux toolchain, then set enable_gnu_indirect_function to yes.
---
gcc/configure| 37 +
gcc/configure.ac | 35 ++
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:50 AM Jim Wilson wrote:
>I committed and pushed it.
Thanks for your help!!
> I see some extra ifunc related testsuite failures, but that is because we
> don't have the glibc ifunc patches upstream yet. It will be important to get
> those done next.
Yeah, hope we can
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:20 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 13:55:40 PDT (-0700), Jim Wilson wrote:
> > These were only enabled for embedded elf originally because that was
> > the safe option, and linux had no obvious use for them. But now that
> > we have new extensions coming
2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be supported
after 2.44? cc Nick and jan.
Thanks
Nelson
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:24 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/24 9:21 AM, Jiawei wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks Jeff! I think I do not have the permissions in the binutils repo,
> > let
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:17 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 8/5/24 8:17 PM, Nelson Chu wrote:
> > 2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be
> > supported after 2.44? cc Nick and jan.
> I don't think it's critical enough to backport to 2.43. I&
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:35 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/6/24 3:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> >>> 2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be
> >>> supported after 2.44? cc Nick and jan.
> >> I don't think it's critical enough to backport to 2.43. I'd just pu
Hi Nick,
Done for cherry-picking two patches to support riscv zimop and zcmop into
binutils-2_43-branch.
Commit bb566d7f, RISC-V: Add support for Zcmop extension
Commit 305fe5ed, RISC-V: Add support for Zimop extension
And also for gas/NEWS in the trunk, moved the entry into 2.43 section due
to t
I think this should be sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org rather than
binut...@sourceware.org, so redirect it to the right place.
Nelson
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:30 AM Jerry Zhang Jian <
jerry.zhangj...@sifive.com> wrote:
> The Zve32x extension depends on the Zicsr extension.
> Currently, enablin
