On 18/11/2021 15:45, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> This is mostly OK, but can't we reduce the number of tests somewhat? For
> example, I think you can merge type_redef_13.c and type_redef_14.c by writing
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
> /* { d
On 23/11/2021 14:16, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/2021 09:37, Murray Steele wrote:
>> On 18/11/2021 15:45, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is mostly OK, but can't we reduce the number of tests somewhat? For
>>> example, I think you can merge type_redef_13.c and type_redef_14.c
On 18/11/2021 15:40, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>
> On 16/11/2021 10:14, Murray Steele via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch moves the arm_simd_type and arm_type_qualifiers enums, and
>> arm_simd_info struct from arm-builtins.c into arm-builtins.h h
Changes from original patch:
1. Merged test_redef_* test files into one
2. Encapsulated contents of arm-mve-builtins.h in namespace arm_mve (missed
in initial patch).
3. Added extern declarations for scalar_types and acle_vector types to
arm-mve-builtins.h (missed in initial patch).
4. Added
Hi,
I'd like to ping this patch revision [1].
Thanks,
Murray
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585400.html
---
On 25/11/2021 09:42, Murray Steele wrote:
> Changes from original patch:
>
> 1. Merged test_redef_* test files into one
> 2. Encapsulated contents of arm
Hi,
Thank you for the feedback, I'll make the noted changes to the changelog and
add the missing end-of-namespace comments.
On 08/12/2021 15:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins.def
> b/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins.def
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0
Changes from original patch:
1. Make mentioned changes to changelog.
2. Add namespace-end comments.
3. Add #error for when arm-mve-builtins.def is included without
defining DEF_MVE_TYPE.
4. Make placement of '#undef DEF_MVE_TYPE' consistent.
---
This patch moves the implementation of MVE ACLE
Hi all,
This patch series implements the arm MVE ACLE types currently found
under config/arm/arm_mve_types.h internally via a new pragma. Exposing
the MVE ACLE types internally allows for an MVE intrinsics
implementation similar to the current SVE implementation.
Any prefix of the patch series sh
Hi all,
This patch moves the arm_simd_type and arm_type_qualifiers enums, and
arm_simd_info struct from arm-builtins.c into arm-builtins.h header.
This is a first step towards internalising the type definitions for MVE
predicate, vector, and tuple types. By moving arm_simd_types into a
header, w
Hi all,
This patch moves the implementation of MVE ACLE types from
arm_mve_types.h to inside GCC via a new pragma, which replaces the prior
type definitions. This allows for the types to be used internally for
intrinsic function definitions.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on arm-none-linux-gn
Hi,
I'd like to ping this patch revision [1].
Thanks,
Murray
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/586476.html
---
On 09/12/2021 15:24, Murray Steele via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Changes from original patch:
>
> 1. Make mentioned changes to changelog.
>
Hi All,
This patch fixes the implementation of the existing __arm_vld1q_z* and
__arm_vst1q_p* MVE intrinsic functions.
The MVE ACLE allows for __ARM_MVE_PRESERVE_USER_NAMESPACE to be defined,
which removes definitions for intrinsic functions without the __arm_
prefix. __arm_vld1q_z* and __arm_vst
Hi,
On 22/12/2021 16:04, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> Is there a PR in bugzilla for this?
>
> R.
>
No, not at this time. It's something I came across whilst
making changes of my own.
For completeness, the ACLE specification I am referencing
has been added below [1].
[1]: https://github.com/
13 matches
Mail list logo
