no regressions. Is it OK for GCC11 ?
Thanks,
Lijia He
gcc/ChangeLog
2020-02-17 Li Jia He
PR tree-optimization/66552
* match.pd (x shift (n mod pow2(c))): Optimizes to
(x shift (n bit_and (pow2(c) - 1)).
testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-02-17 Li Jia He
PR tree
Hi,
On 2020/2/17 4:30 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:01:13AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Li Jia He wrote:
This patch wants to fix PR66552 on gimple and optimizes (x shift (n mod C))
to (x shift (n bit_and
Hi,
On 2020/2/22 11:12 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Li Jia He wrote:
Also the pattern doing the standalone transform does
/* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR,
i.e. "X % C" into "X & (C - 1)", if X and C are positive.
Hi,
On 2020/2/24 4:16 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
On 2020/2/22 11:12 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Li Jia He wrote:
Also the pattern doing the standalone transform does
/* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR
-branch.
The regression testing for the patch was done on GCC 9 branch on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 9 LE)
with no regressions. Is it OK for GCC 9 branch ?
Thanks,
Lijia He
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-11-27 Li Jia He
PR target/92098
* config/rs6000/predicates.md
On 2019/11/27 2:42 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi Lijia,
on 2019/11/27 下午2:31, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
In order to fix PR92098, we need to define vec_cmp_* and vcond_mask_*. In fact,
PR92132 already fixed the issue on the trunk. We need to backport PR92132 int
part to gcc-9-branch. This patch
-06-24 Li Jia He
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (TARGET_MADDLD): Remove the restriction of
TARGET_POWERPC64.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (maddld): Change maddld match_operand from DI
to GPR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-06-24 Li Jia He
* gcc.target/powe
On 2019/6/24 3:38 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Lijia,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 01:00:05AM -0500, Li Jia He wrote:
>From PowerPC ISA3.0, the description of `maddld RT, RA.RB, RC` is as follows:
64-bit RA and RB are multiplied and then the RC is signed extend to 128 bits,
and add t
of x is unsigned
int and XXX_MIN is 0, we can still optimize it to 'x > y'.
The regression testing for the patch was done on GCC mainline on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 9 LE)
with no regressions. Is it OK for trunk ?
Thanks,
Lijia He
gcc/ChangeLo
On 2019/6/27 11:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/27/19 12:11 AM, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
According to the optimizable case described by Qi Feng on
issue 88784, we can combine the cases into the following:
1. x > y && x != XXX_MIN --> x > y
2. x > y && x == XX
On 2019/7/1 3:30 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:55 PM Li Jia He wrote:
On 2019/6/27 11:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/27/19 12:11 AM, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
According to the optimizable case described by Qi Feng on
issue 88784
On 2019/7/2 4:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Li Jia He wrote:
On 2019/7/1 3:30 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:55 PM Li Jia He wrote:
On 2019/6/27 11:48 PM
on GCC mainline on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 8 LE)
with no regressions. Is it OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Lijia
---
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-02-15 Li Jia He
PR target/88100
* gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin): Remove
sext_hwi in IN_RANGE
Yes, you are correct. If there is no question with this patch,
I will backport this to GCC 8.
Thanks,
Lijia
On 2019/2/20 12:13 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On 2/19/19 8:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 03:38:56AM -0600, Li Jia He wrote:
GCC revision 259524
?
Thanks,
Lijia He
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-05-05 Li Jia He
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (two_value_replacement):
Fix a typo in parameter detection.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-05-05 Li Jia He
* gcc.dg/pr88676.c: Modify the include header file.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr37508
On 2019/5/6 7:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:19:15PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
The regression testing for the patch was done on GCC mainline on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 9 LE)
with no regressions. Is it OK for trunk and backport to gcc 9 ?
Whil
On 2019/5/6 8:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 08:22:41PM +0800, Li Jia He wrote:
Dunno why this changed, if you want it in phiopt1, you need "phiopt1"
in scan-tree-dump-not as well, if you want optimized dump, you need
-fdump-tree-optimized instead.
When I tes
On 2019/5/6 7:19 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 08:31, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
GCC revision 267634 implemented two_value_replacement function.
However, a typo occurred during the parameter check, which caused
us to miss some optimizations.
The intent of the code might be
copy)
@@ -409,6 +409,7 @@
Pat Haugen
Michael Hayes
Alan Hayward
+Li Jia He
Mark Heffernan
George Helffrich
Daniel Hellstrom
19 matches
Mail list logo
