he dynamic linker filename,
not the dir, i.e. /lib/ld-linux-hf.so.3 (for this particular case).
My 2c.
--
Konstantinos Margaritis
t filename of course- are the only libs that will be in /lib straight,
the rest will be in /lib/. So there is no danger of any conflict, at
least not with libraries.
--
Konstantinos Margaritis
-which would stay
in /lib- , then we'd have a /libhf top directory with just one file, the
linker. Or a symlink from /lib to /libhf or /lib/ to /libhf in
Debian's case, but that defeats the purposes of having a new /libhf directory,
doesn't it?
I hope I was clearer now.
--
Konstantinos Margaritis
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:36:07 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> We really want consistency about the dynamic linker names etc. across
> different targets and sneaking silently multiarch paths on one architecture
> would make it inconsistent with all the others. So, please just use
> /libhf/ld-linux.so.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:32:22 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> every distro uses a unique triplet, by putting the triplet in there you
> then need to get all distros to change to using the same triplets. I
> personally prefer /libhfp rather than /libhf but I am ok with using
> either. Any change from
