Re: [Patch][doc][PR101843]clarification on building gcc and binutils together

2021-09-23 Thread John Henning via Gcc-patches
Hello Jeff, >I would strongly recommend removing all the documentation related to >single tree builds. Two questions: (1) When you say "all", are you suggesting that in-the-gcc-tree builds of gmp, mpfr, mpc, and isl should no longer be documented? Or only in-tree builds of binutils

PING Re: [Patch][doc][PR101843]clarification on building gcc and binutils together

2021-10-14 Thread John Henning via Gcc-patches
Hi Jeff, not sure what you mean by "all", please can you clarify? On 9/23/21, 7:08 AM, "Gcc-patches on behalf of John Henning via Gcc-patches" wrote: Hello Jeff, >I would strongly recommend removing all the documentation related to >sing