[r14-2462 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-12.c execution test on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 450b05ce54d3f08c583c3b5341233ce0df99725b is the first bad commit commit 450b05ce54d3f08c583c3b5341233ce0df99725b Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Wed Jul 12 13:50:21 2023 +0200 libgomp: Use libnuma for OpenMP's partition=nearest allocation trait caused with GCC configured w

RE: [x86 PATCH] Fix FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr91681-1.c

> The recent change in TImode parameter passing on x86_64 results in the FAIL > of pr91681-1.c. The issue is that with the extra flexibility, the combine > pass is > now spoilt for choice between using either the > *add3_doubleword_concat or the *add3_doubleword_zext > patterns, when one operand

RE: [x86 PATCH] Fix FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr91681-1.c

> -Original Message- > From: Jiang, Haochen > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 10:50 AM > To: Roger Sayle ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: 'Uros Bizjak' > Subject: RE: [x86 PATCH] Fix FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr91681-1.c > > > The recent change in TImode parameter passing on x86_64 results in th

RE: [r14-2639 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95839-v8.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "optimized: basic block" on Linux/x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 9:28 PM > To: Maciej W. Rozycki > Cc: haochen.jiang ; gcc- > regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jiang, Haochen > > Subject: Re: [r14-2639 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95839-v8.c > scan-tre

RE: [PATCH] i386: Extend cvtps2pd to memory

Hi all, I revised my patch according to all your reviews. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. BRs, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: Liu, Hongtao > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:57 PM > To: Uros Bizjak ; Jiang, Haochen > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] i386: Ex

RE: [PATCH][pushed] MAINTAINERS: fix alphabetic sorting

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Liška > Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 6:17 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Jiang, Haochen > Subject: [PATCH][pushed] MAINTAINERS: fix alphabetic sorting > > ChangeLog: > > * MAINTAINERS: fix sorting of names > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 1

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

Hi Jakub, > So, what does this imply for the current ISAs? AVX10 will imply AVX2 on the ISA level. And we suppose AVX10 is an independent ISA feature set. Although sharing the same instructions and encodings, AVX10 and AVX512 are conceptual independent features, which means they are orthogonal.

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 1:38 PM > To: Phoebe Wang > Cc: Hongtao Liu ; Joseph Myers > ; Jiang, Haochen ; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org; ubiz...@gmail.com; Liu, Hongtao > ; Zhang, Annita ; Wang, > Phoebe ; x86-64-abi a...@googlegroups.com>

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

g 8, 2023 at 10:15 AM Jiang, Haochen via Gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Jakub, > > > > > So, what does this imply for the current ISAs? > > > > AVX10 will imply AVX2 on the ISA level. And we suppose AVX10 is an > > independent ISA f

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 9:31 PM > To: Phoebe Wang > Cc: Joseph Myers ; Wang, Phoebe > ; Hongtao Liu ; Jiang, Haochen > ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; ubiz...@gmail.com; Liu, > Hongtao ; Zhang, Annita ; > x86-64-abi ; llvm-dev d...@lists.llvm

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

Hi all, There are lots of discussions on arch level and ABIs and I really appreciate that. For the arch level issue, it might be a little early to discuss and should not block these patches. For ABI issue, the problem actually comes from the current behavior between GCC and clang/LLVM are diff

[r14-3148 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 on Linux/x86_64

From: haochen.jiang Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2023 5:26 PM To: rguent...@suse.de; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jiang, Haochen Subject: [r14-3148 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 on Linux/x86_64 On L

[r14-2946 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr87007-5.c scan-assembler-times vxorps[^\n\r]*xmm[0-9] 0 on Linux/x86_64

From: haochen.jiang Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2023 5:26 PM To: rguent...@suse.de; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jiang, Haochen Subject: [r14-2946 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr87007-5.c scan-assembler-times vxorps[^\n\r]*xmm[0-9] 0 on Linux/x86_64 On Linux/x86_64,

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: ZiNgA BuRgA > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 5:27 PM > To: Richard Biener ; Hongtao Liu > > Cc: Jiang, Haochen ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support > > Another way (not saying this is better, just throwing out idea

RE: [r14-2314 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr100711-2.c scan-assembler-times vpandn 8 on Linux/x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: Hongtao Liu > Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 3:55 PM > To: Beulich, Jan > Cc: haochen.jiang ; Jiang, Haochen > ; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [r14-2314 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr100711-2.c scan- > a

[r13-5971 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr108774.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, a33e3dcbd15e73603796e30b5eeec11a0c8bacec is the first bad commit commit a33e3dcbd15e73603796e30b5eeec11a0c8bacec Author: Vladimir N. Makarov Date: Mon Feb 13 16:05:04 2023 -0500 RA: Clear reg equiv caller_save_p flag when clearing defined_p flag caused FAIL: gcc.target/

RE: [COMMITTED] i386: Use 2x-wider modes when emulating QImode vector instructions

> gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_vecop_qihi2): > Rewrite to expand to 2x-wider (e.g. V16QI -> V16HImode) > instructions when available. Emulate truncation via > ix86_expand_vec_perm_const_1 when native truncate insn > is not available. > (ix86

RE: [PATCH] i386: Add syscall to enable AMX for latest kernels

Hi all, I would like to backport this patch to GCC 12 release branch as machines with the version of default GCC is 12.x (which is always using newer kernels), if the patch is not backported, the amx tests will always fail. Ok for backport? BRs, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: Ur

RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform vpcmpeqd/vpxor/vblendvps to vblendvps for ~op0

Hi Uros, I have fixed that in this patch attached for checking in. Is that ok for trunk? Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Thx, Haochen -Original Message- From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:14 AM To: Jiang, Haochen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao Subjec

[r13-3172 Regression] FAIL:libgomp.oacc-c../../libgomp.oacc-c-c..-common/kernels-loop-g.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, f30e9fd33e56a5a721346ea6140722e1b193db42 is the first bad commit commit f30e9fd33e56a5a721346ea6140722e1b193db42 Author: Eugene Rozenfeld mailto:ero...@microsoft.com>> Date: Thu Apr 21 16:43:24 2022 -0700 Set discriminators for call stmts on the same line within the same ba

[r13-3212 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-19.c scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 .VEC_PERM_EXPR. on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, b88adba751da635c6f0c353c5bc51bbe2ecf4c89 is the first bad commit commit b88adba751da635c6f0c353c5bc51bbe2ecf4c89 Author: Liwei Xu liwei...@intel.com Date: Fri Sep 23 13:46:02 2022 +0800 Optimize nested permutation to single VEC_PERM_EXPR [PR54346] ca

RE: [r13-3172 Regression] FAIL:libgomp.oacc-c../../libgomp.oacc-c-c..-common/kernels-loop-g.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

If that has been fixed, just ignore that mail. It is run through by a script and got the result few days ago. However, the sendmail service was down on that machine and I just noticed that issue. So I sent that result manually today in case that is not fixed. Sorry for the disturb! BRs, Haoche

RE: [r13-3172 Regression] FAIL:libgomp.oacc-c../../libgomp.oacc-c-c..-common/kernels-loop-g.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O2 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

Hi Rozenfeld, I just checkout to your commit and the test still got failed. It is reporting like this: xgcc: error: /export/users2/haochenj/src/gcc/master/./libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop-g.c: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) Also fix a typo in m

RE: [PATCH 2/6] Support Intel AVX-VNNI-INT8

> -Original Message- > From: Hongtao Liu > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 12:05 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Support Intel AVX-VNNI-INT8 > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:57 PM Haochen Jiang via Gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.o

RE: [r13-3219 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92658-sse4.c scan-assembler-times pmovzxwq 2 on Linux/x86_64

Yes, the mail service on script machine was down previously after expected reboot and it just recovered but still ran into some problems when sending previously email. That is why this is the only stuck mail got sent and sorry for the disturb. > -Original Message- > From: Hongtao Liu >

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Add a parameter for the builtin function of prefetch to align with LLVM

> -Original Message- > From: Segher Boessenkool > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 5:14 AM > To: Andrew Pinski > Cc: Jiang, Haochen ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; > aol...@gcc.gnu.org; richard.sandif...@arm.com; uweig...@de.ibm.com; > li...@gcc.gnu.org; g...@amylaar.uk; dje@gmail.com; > o

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Add a parameter for the builtin function of prefetch to align with LLVM

> -Original Message- > From: Segher Boessenkool > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 5:07 AM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Liu, Hongtao > ; ubiz...@gmail.com; richard.earns...@arm.com; > richard.sandif...@arm.com; marcus.shawcr...@arm.com; > kyrylo.t

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Add a parameter for the builtin function of prefetch to align with LLVM

> -Original Message- > From: Segher Boessenkool > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 2:54 AM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Liu, Hongtao > ; ubiz...@gmail.com; richard.earns...@arm.com; > richard.sandif...@arm.com; marcus.shawcr...@arm.com; > kyrylo.

RE: [PATCH] Support Intel CMPccXADD

> -Original Message- > From: Gcc-patches bounces+haochen.jiang=intel@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Haochen Jiang > via Gcc-patches > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 5:01 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Liu, Hongtao > Subject: [PATCH] Support Intel CMPccXADD > > Hi all, > > I just

RE: [PATCH] Reconstruct i386 testsuite with __builtin_cpu_supports

Hi Uros, I understand that we always keep the old testcases there. It is always safe to do that. But I have another question, if we add something new in one of the existing files in the future, should we use __builtin_cpu_supports to keep the code clearer or stick to cpuids? I believe __built

RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.

> -Original Message- > From: Hongyu Wang > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 4:50 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: GCC Patches ; Liu, Hongtao > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform > pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0x to ptest. > > > +(define_split > > + [(set (reg:CCZ FLA

RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.

> -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 4:59 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform > pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0x to ptest. > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:01 AM

RE: [PATCH] Reconstruct i386 testsuite with __builtin_cpu_supports

That make sense to me. Thx! > -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 5:04 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: Hongyu Wang ; Liu, Hongtao > ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reconstruct i386 testsuite with __builtin_cpu_supports > > On Sat, May 7, 2

RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.

Hi all, I just refined this patch with more explanation in commit message. No code change compare to last change, which removed ix86_match_ccmode. Ok for trunk? BRs, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: Jiang, Haochen > Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 9:55 AM > To: Uros Bizjak > Cc: gcc-p

RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.

> -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 5:12 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao ; Hongyu > Wang > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform > pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0x to ptest. > > On Thu, May 12

[r13-5092 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-46.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

Hi all, This is the bisect result for the latest regression which fail to send to mailing list. It seems that the mail command in s-nail went down after my machine got upgraded, still investigating why. On Linux/x86_64, 4e0b504f26f78ff02e80ad98ebbf8ded3aa6ffa1 is the first bad commit

[r13-5244 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/SARD-tc841-basic-00182-min.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

The mail system is still broken on that machine, still sending this manually. Before that mail down, I will keep check the script daily to see if there is new regression. BTW, since there is a Bugzilla for r13-5202 regression, not resending that report On Linux/x86_64, c6a09bfa038ccbfc9f1

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 4:36 PM > To: Jakub Jelinek > Cc: Jiang, Haochen ; ZiNgA BuRgA > ; Hongtao Liu ; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jakub Jel

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Jakub Jelinek > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 11:02 PM > To: Hongtao Liu > Cc: Richard Biener ; Jiang, Haochen > ; ZiNgA BuRgA ; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:35:55PM +0800,

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Hongtao Liu > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:19 AM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; Richard Biener > ; ZiNgA BuRgA ; > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jiang, H

RE: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 3:32 PM > To: Hongtao Liu > Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; Jiang, Haochen > ; ZiNgA BuRgA ; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Intel AVX10.1 Compiler Design and Support > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:36 PM Hongtao

[r14-3571 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c scan-assembler palignr on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, caa7a99a052929d5970677c5b639e1fa5166e334 is the first bad commit commit caa7a99a052929d5970677c5b639e1fa5166e334 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Aug 30 11:57:47 2023 +0200 tree-optimization/111228 - combine two VEC_PERM_EXPRs caused FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c

[r14-3823 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 72) on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 50b5199cff690891726877e1c00ac53dfb7cc1c8 is the first bad commit commit 50b5199cff690891726877e1c00ac53dfb7cc1c8 Author: benjamin priour Date: Sat Sep 9 18:03:56 2023 +0200 analyzer: Move gcc.dg/analyzer tests to c-c++-common (2) [PR96395] caused FAIL: c-c++-common/analy

[r14-4046 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/110807.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

On Linux/x86_64, 3a0e01f6bb1d6ec444001f2caea6ef43a4a83e3a is the first bad commit commit 3a0e01f6bb1d6ec444001f2caea6ef43a4a83e3a Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri Sep 1 21:27:57 2023 +0100 libstdc++: Add support for running tests with multiple -std options caused FAIL: 23_containers/vec

RE: [wwwdocs] gcc-13: Mention Intel new ISA and march support.

Hi Gerald, I will remove "to GCC" here if there is no more comment from others on Thursday. For me it is reasonable. Thx, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: Gerald Pfeifer > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:56 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [www

RE: [PATCH] i386: Share AES xmm intrin with VAES

> > a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md index > > 33e281901cf..e7d565a8389 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md > > @@ -25107,67 +25107,71 @@ > > > > ;; > > ;; > > > > (define_insn

[r13-5318 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/init/new51.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64

This is the recent regression on gcc trunk. Seems it got fixed. If that is the case, plz ignore that. As mentioned in previous thread, before the mail system got fixed on server, I will manually forward this email. BRs, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: haochen.jiang > Sent: Wednes

RE: [PATCH] i386: Add syscall to enable AMX for latest kernels

> -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 10:54 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Add syscall to enable AMX for latest kernels > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:04 AM Haochen Jiang > wrote: > > > >

RE: [PATCH] i386: Add syscall to enable AMX for latest kernels

> -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 3:06 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Add syscall to enable AMX for latest kernels > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 4:23 AM Jiang, Haochen > wrote: > > > >

RE: [PATCH] i386: Extend cvtps2pd to memory

> -Original Message- > From: Uros Bizjak > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 2:20 PM > To: Jiang, Haochen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao > Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Extend cvtps2pd to memory > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 7:59 AM Haochen Jiang > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Th

RE: [PATCH] [i386] Remove register restriction on operands for andnot insn

Hi Hongtao, I have changed that message in this patch. Ok for trunk? Thx, Haochen -Original Message- From: Hongtao Liu Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 3:25 PM To: Jiang, Haochen Cc: GCC Patches ; Liu, Hongtao Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386] Remove register restriction on operands for andn

RE: [PATCH] [i386] Optimize a ^ ((a ^ b) & mask) to (~mask & a) | (b & mask).

Hi Uros, I have also tested on -m32. They do not fail. Thx, Haochen -Original Message- From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 3:22 AM To: Jiang, Haochen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386] Optimize a ^ ((a ^ b) & mask) to (~mask & a) | (b

RE: [PATCH] [i386] Optimize a ^ ((a ^ b) & mask) to (~mask & a) | (b & mask).

Hi Uros, Has fixed that format issue with this new patch. Ok for trunk? Thx, Haochen -Original Message- From: Uros Bizjak Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 3:22 AM To: Jiang, Haochen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386] Optimize a ^ ((a ^ b) & mask) to