EFAULT_STK_CLASH_GUARD_SIZE
which I think are because this commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0a85544e1aaeca41133ecfc438cda913dbc0f122
should have regenerated and committed config.in <http://config.in/>
Christina, can you please have a look?
FX
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109373
I don’t believe it is widely used, and it was removed from everywhere else in
gcc.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK to commit?
FX
0001-libgfortran-remove-support-for-enable-intermodule.patch
Description: Binary data
> OK, thanks.
Committed at
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ecc96eb5d2a0e5dd93365ef76a58d7f754273934
“IEEE_SUPPORT_*” functions.
FX
e case of both quiet and signaling NaNs, which is now done
> systematically.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> OK to commit?
>
> FX
0001-Add-__builtin_iseqsig.patch
Description: Binary data
ping**3
>> Le 6 juin 2023 à 20:15, FX Coudert a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (It took me a while to get back to this.)
>>
>> This is a new and improved version of the patch at
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602932.h
.
OK to commit?
FX
0001-core-Support-heap-based-trampolines.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
> Since this affects the ABI of libgcc I think we don't want that part
> to be user configurable but rather determined by
> some static list of targets that opt-in to this config.
If I do that, do the Linux maintainers want Linux in or out?
> You mention setjmp/longjmp - on darwin and other
6 weeks later, I’d like to ask a global maintainer to review this.
The idea was okay’ed previously by Joseph Myers, but he asked for testing of
both the quiet and signalling NaN cases, which is now done.
FX
> Le 6 juin 2023 à 20:15, FX Coudert a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> (It too
libgcc.
Currently regtesting on x86_64 linux and darwin (it was fine before I split up
into three commits, so I’m re-testing to make sure I didn’t screw anything up).
OK to commit?
FX
0001-core-Support-heap-based-trampolines.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-target-Support-heap-based
A rather trivial fix for fprintf() specifier of a HOST_WIDE_INT value.
Tested on aarch64-apple-darwin. OK to commit?
FX
0001-aarch64-fix-format-specifier.patch
Description: Binary data
Bordering on obvious, tested on darwin where the test case fails before (and
now passes).
OK to commit?
FX
0001-Testsuite-fix-contructor-priority-test.patch
Description: Binary data
testsuite is now
clean:
# of expected passes 5238
# of expected failures 194
# of unsupported tests 12
OK to commit?
FX
0001-Testsuite-fix-analyzer-tests-on-Darwin.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
A gentle ping on the revised patch, for Richard or another global reviewer.
Thanks,
FX
> Le 5 août 2023 à 16:20, FX Coudert a écrit :
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Here is an amended version of the patch, taking
> into consideration your requests
addition to the linker). Adding the flag to the compilation of
the source file makes the test pass on darwin.
OK to commit?
FX
0001-Testsuite-LTO-silence-warning-to-make-test-pass-on-D.patch
Description: Binary data
in emit the DW_AT_call_file
2. adjusting the regexp to match, making the internal block of parentheses
optional
I chose the second approach. It makes the test pass on darwin. If someone can
test it on linux, it’d be appreciated :) I don’t have ready access to such a
system right now.
Once tha
Hi,
The fact that this test needs alias support was indicated in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85656 but never committed. Without
it, the test fails on darwin.
OK to commit?
FX
0001-Testsuite-mark-IPA-test-as-requiring-alias-support.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
> IMO, changes like this qualify as obvious, so I’d go ahead (thanks for this
> test fail triage)
Makes sense. I’ve committed, as well as another one, attached, slightly
amending the expected pattern of a sarif plugin test.
FX
0001-Testsuite-plugin-make-testcase-patter
=./analyzer_kernel_plugin.so (test for warnings, line 36)
XPASS: gcc.dg/plugin/taint-CVE-2011-0521-5-fixed.c
-fplugin=./analyzer_kernel_plugin.so (test for bogus messages, line 39)
Committed to trunk,
FX
0001-Testsuite-darwin-Fix-analyzer-testcases.patch
Description: Binary data
aarch64-apple-darwin.
OK to commit?
FX
0001-libgomp-testsuite-Do-not-call-nonstandard-functions-.patch
Description: Binary data
Committed as obvious, making gcc.dg/darwin-minversion-link.c pass on macOS 13
and 14 (darwin22 and darwin23, respectively).
FX
0001-Testsuite-darwin-account-for-macOS-13-and-14.patch
Description: Binary data
fective target just for one test, though, no?
Another possibility would be to replace #if !defined(__APPLE__) by #if
defined(__linux__), or glibc?
FX
>> I understand, I wanted to not just report the issue but propose an option.
>> It seems a bit heavy to design an effective target just for one test,
>> though, no?
>
> It has the advantage of getting it right on all current and future targets.
Something like this? (not tested yet)
diff --gi
Revised patch. I does the job on darwin, can you check that it still tests the
functions on Linux?
And if so, OK to commit?
FX
0001-Testsuite-DWARF2-adjust-regexp-to-match-darwin-outpu.patch
Description: Binary data
> Revised patch. I does the job on darwin, can you check that it still tests
> the functions on Linux?
> And if so, OK to commit?
With the correct file, sorry.
0001-libgomp-testsuite-Do-not-call-nonstandard-functions.patch
Description: Binary data
ping**2
> Le 6 juin 2023 à 20:15, FX Coudert a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> (It took me a while to get back to this.)
>
> This is a new and improved version of the patch at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602932.html
> It addresses the comment
es
> optional
>
> I chose the second approach. It makes the test pass on darwin. If someone can
> test it on linux, it’d be appreciated :) I don’t have ready access to such a
> system right now.
>
> Once that passes, OK to commit?
> FX
>
0001-Testsuite-DWARF2-adjust-regexp-to-match-darwin-outpu.patch
Description: Binary data
> std::max and std::min, introduced by d99d73c77d1e and 2bad0eeb5573, are not
> available because is not included.
I originally thought this was only seen in cross-compilers, but it actually
broke bootstrap on darwin.
Attached patch restores it, OK to commit?
FX
0001-Analyzer-i
their
name, it was kept.
- All uses referring to powerpc*-apple-darwin* were kept as-is, because those
versions all predate the change to “macOS”.
- I did not touch Ada or D
- I did not touch testsuite comments
Tested by building on x86_64-apple-darwin, and generating the docs.
OK to push?
FX
Hi,
Thanks Sandra and Iain.
Patch pushed.
FX
Hi,
I was about to ping the attached patch, and realised it bordered on obvious, so
I pushed it directly.
FX
> Le 19 août 2023 à 22:40, FX Coudert a écrit :
>
> Bordering on obvious, tested on darwin where the test case fails before (and
> now passes).
>
> OK to commi
Hi,
ping**2 on the revised patch, for Richard or another global reviewer. So far
all review feedback is that it’s a step forward, and it’s been widely used for
both aarch64-darwin and x86_64-darwin distributions for almost three years now.
OK to commit?
FX
> Le 5 août 2023 à 16:20,
Pushed as obvious to fix two testsuite FAILs on darwin with recent macOS
linkers when -no_pie is passed.
FX
0001-testsuite-adjust-for-darwin-linker-warning.patch
Description: Binary data
601 - 633 of 633 matches
Mail list logo