t; futex.cc needs the same change ...
I am still noticing a problem building a native X86_64 ToT compiler on
Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS.
Attached is a patch where the CPP guards in atomic_futex.h are
reflected in futex.cc, which fixes my build problem.
OK to commit?
Thanks,
Doug
>From 1debe13da342ac30d905e12
rom 2a6b11b30ff335ea8e669ae8d3f1bd531ac5b8d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Gilmore
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:49:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [MIPS] PR target/78176 add -mindexed-load-store.
PR target/78176
* config.gcc (supported_defaults): Add indexed-load-store.
(with_indexed_load_store):
On 01/17/2017 05:41 AM, Moore, Catherine wrote:
>
>
>> ...
>> Having thought further I agree we can safely ignore DSP indexed load
>> and micromips LWXS on
>> the basis that DSP code will not run on a MIPS64 processor anyway (at
>> least none that I
>> know of) so the issue cannot occur and simila
ity of
>> these instructions.
>>
>> Macro name: __mips_no_lxc1_sxc1
>> Defined when !ISA_HAS_LXC1_SXC1 so would be present even when
>> targeting a core that
>> doesn't have the instructions anyway.
>>
>> Any refinements to this Catherine?
>>
&
Add missing attachment.
Doug
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/77654
* tree-ssa-alias.c (issue_prefetch_ref): Add call
to duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info.
From ec9069b7b7b07d5fda9c04aaa9b385fba89a6e16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Gilmore
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:18:42 -0700
It looks like the original message was dropped, resending.
Doug
From: Doug Gilmore
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 2:12 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654
From:
https://gcc.gnu.org
> From: Richard Biener [rguent...@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:48 AM
> To: Doug Gilmore
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Doug Gilmore wrote:
>
> &
> From: Richard Biener [rguent...@suse.de]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:43 AM
> To: Doug Gilmore
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654
>
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Doug Gilmore wrote:
>
> ...
&g
> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 12:17 PM
> To: Matthew Fortune
> Cc: Doug Gilmore; Richard Biener; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654
> ...
>
> Since t
> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 12:17 PM
> To: Matthew Fortune
> Cc: Doug Gilmore; Richard Biener; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654
>
> On 23 Se
Doug
From d7a115e12856f2bcd4cefab38378f5d947c7d96a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Gilmore
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:28:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77808
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/77808
* tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c (issue_prefetch_ref): Fix problem
exposed by speci
It looks like my original message was dropped, resending -- Doug
From: Doug Gilmore
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:35 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Christophe Lyon
Subject: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at
tree
It looks like my email being sent from my company is being dropped, re sending
via my gmail account.
Doug
From: Doug Gilmore
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:35 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Christophe Lyon
Subject: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE
Hi Christophe,
> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 7:57 AM
> To: Doug Gilmore
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
> duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 sta
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 12:05 AM
>To: Doug Gilmore
>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>
>On
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:23 AM
>To: Doug Gilmore
>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in
>duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
>
>On
ted
with a particular group. Thus once the optimal IV set is found, a
different IV may chosen, which causes negative constant offsets to be
used.
>From 3ea70edb3bf68057c955d2b22204f17bb670f65a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Gilmore
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:49:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH]
On 11/22/2016 08:07 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Doug Gilmore wrote:
>> I haven't seen any followups to this discussion of Bin's patch to
>> PR68303 and PR69710, the patch submission:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02000
With r213117 we are seeing additional failures while testing a bare-iron build:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
...
This newly added test does a fork, though it has a guard
to prevent testing targets that don't support fork, but the
guard needs to be tweaked:
diff
19 matches
Mail list logo
