[PING]
Cupertino Miranda writes:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Please, please, give me some feedback on this one.
> I just don't want to have to keep asking you for time on this small
> pending patches that I also have to keep track on.
>
> I realized your committed the other
> On 1/24/23 05:24, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
>> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
>> I have changed the patch.
>> Unfortunately in case of rx target I could not make
>> scan-assembler-symbol-section to match. I believe it is because the
>> .section and
Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
>> On 1/24/23 05:24, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
>>> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
>>> I have changed the patch.
>>> Unfortunately in case of rx target I could not make
>>> scan-assembler-symbol-sec
gentle ping
Cupertino Miranda writes:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> First of all thanks for your quick review.
> Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox.
>
>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Changed target code to sel
gentle ping
Cupertino Miranda writes:
>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> This commit is a follow up of bugzilla #107181.
>>> The commit /a0aafbc/ changed the default implementation of the
>>> SELECT_SECTION hook in order to mat
Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
> gentle ping
>
> Cupertino Miranda writes:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> First of all thanks for your quick review.
>> Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox.
>>
>>> On 12/
Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
> gentle ping
>
> Cupertino Miranda writes:
>
>>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>> This commit is a follow up of bugzilla #107181.
>>>> The commit /a0aafbc/ changed the defa
PING PING
Cupertino Miranda writes:
> Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
>
>> gentle ping
>>
>> Cupertino Miranda writes:
>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> First of all thanks for your quick review.
>>> Apologies for the delay rep
PING PING
Cupertino Miranda writes:
> Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
>
>> gentle ping
>>
>> Cupertino Miranda writes:
>>
>>>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>>> This commit is a follow up of
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile'
>> >
Cupertino Miranda writes:
>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> This commit is a follow up of bugzilla #107181.
>>> The commit /a0aafbc/ changed the default implementation of the
>>> SELECT_SECTION hook in order to match clang/llvm
Hi Jeff,
Kindly calling your attention to this thread.
Regards,
Cupertino
Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
> Richard Biener writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On
c-*-*]
+ || [check-flags { "" { powerpc64-*-* } { -m32 } }] } {
+ return 0
+}
+ return 1
+}
Jeff Law writes:
> On 12/7/22 08:45, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>> This commit is a follow
Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
> I have changed the patch.
>
> Unfortunately in case of rx target I could not make
> scan-assembler-symbol-section to match. I believe it is because the
> .section and .global entries or
Hi Jeff,
Can you please confirm if the patch is Ok?
Thanks,
Cupertino
> Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:
>
>> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
>> I have changed the patch.
>>
>> Unfortunately in case of rx target I could not make
>> sc
o your review.
Best regards,
Cupertino Miranda
This commit is a follow up of bugzilla #107181.
The commit /a0aafbc/ changed the default implementation of the
SELECT_SECTION hook in order to match clang/llvm behaviour w.r.t the
placement of `const volatile' objects.
However, the following targets use target-specific selection functions
and the
Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile'
defined variables.
This change is in the context of the bugzilla #170181.
gcc/ChangeLog:
v850.c(v850_select_section): Changed function.
---
gcc/config/v850/v850.cc | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/co
Hi Jeff,
First of all thanks for your quick review.
Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox.
> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile'
>> defined variab
> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> This commit is a follow up of bugzilla #107181.
>> The commit /a0aafbc/ changed the default implementation of the
>> SELECT_SECTION hook in order to match clang/llvm behaviour w.r.t the
>> placement
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
