On 2 October 2013 13:28, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand why those 2 files differ by more than 1 extra argument,
> so I am changing that.
>
> Bootstrap and testsuite on x86_64.
>
> 2013-10-03 Marc Glisse
>
> * libsupc++/del_op.cc (operator delete): Don't test for 0 be
A previous fix to a performance problem in std::sort unfortunately has
lead to a crashing bug in std::nth_element.
The following minimal patch fixes the problem (there are a couple of
different ways of fixing it, this is the shortest and safest).
2013-09-19 Chris Jefferson
PR libstdc++/58800
*
The following patch (related to my 58800 patch) adds many more tests
for several important functions. While 58800 is my fault, the reason
it was not caught earlier is that many functions in libstdc++ have
almost no testing. This works toward fixing that.
These tests are kept to an acceptable amoun
Personally, I consider the testing insufficent, although the testing
was already insufficient! Note that this is my opinion, don't assume I
talk for all of libstdc++!
After I broke std::nth_element in 4.8.2 (woops), I am of the view that
the libstdc++ testsuite is defficient -- many code paths are
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christopher Jefferson
Date: 17 September 2015 at 18:59
Subject: Re: vector lightweight debug mode
To: Jonathan Wakely
On 16 September 2015 at 21:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16/09/15 21:37 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>
>>>>
On 25 November 2013 21:02, François Dumont wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Following N3644 discussion thread here is a patch proposal to remove
> default zero-initialization of unordered containers iterator. I also took the
> time to remove default zero-init of nodes _M_nxt pointer.
>
> 2013-11-25 Franço
My concern with accepting this patch is that many of libstdc++'s hash
functions are awful from a mixing point of view -- you would get
exactly the same problem from users who have integers which are always
a multiple of a power of 2 (which is in practice not uncommon). This
would give exactly the s
Some (very small) questions / cleanups
1) Do you plan on supporting CXX11 ABI on C++03? There is some #if
__cplusplus < 201103L inside the new basic_string.
2) Is there a need for the #if 0 _M_mutate?
I tried bootstrapping on Mac OS X 10.10, and got lots of linking
issues, the relevant part is:
it, but I think the algorithms need something beyond just one
or two hardwired inputs.
Chris
On 10 November 2014 22:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10/11/14 23:14 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
>>
>>I introduced the random tests after Christopher Jefferson request to
>>
On 6 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> On 6 September 2011 20:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> What's a dangling vector anyway? One that has been moved from?
>>
>> Apparently not, since a moved-from vector would pass _
On 8 Sep 2011, at 18:34, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 07:44 AM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>> Is tuple_cat now considered conforming?
>> No, see:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159
> By the way, Daniel, I was considering giving that issue a try, if you have
> tips (or ev
On 20 May 2011, at 20:30, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:32:16AM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> G++ has had a long-standing bug with unqualified name resolution in
>> templates: if we didn't find any declaration when looking up a name in
>> the template definition, we would do an
12 matches
Mail list logo
