Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

2011-12-14 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:41 +0800, Doug Kwan wrote: > Sorry about my oversight. I am on vacation now until Dec 19. I don't > have good internet access now and I will backport this to upstream 4.6 > after I come back if the 4.6 maintainers agree to take this. There isn't really anything to backpo

Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

2011-12-20 Thread Brendan Conoboy
Anyone? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:41 +0800, Doug Kwan wrote: >> Sorry about my oversight. I am on vacation now until Dec 19.  I don't >> have good internet access now and I will backport this to upstream 4.6 >>

Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

2011-12-20 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > This is ok for 4.6 if it has been sufficiently tested. Okay! Is there any testing you'd like to see beyond the aforementioned success with arm and x86_64 linux? -Brendan