On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi, This is the 8th version of the patch.
>
> Compared to the 7th version, the major changes are several documentation
> wording issues raised by Joseph.
>
> The 7th version is at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/664032.html
>
>
This was added as part of the initial Concepts TS implementation and
reflects an early version of the Concepts TS paper, which is very
different from standard C++20 concepts (and even from more recent
versions of the Concepts TS, support for which we deprecated in GCC 14
and removed for GCC 15). S
> Quick question. We did something like this to aid internal
> testing/bringup. Our variant adjusted a ton of the mode iterators in
> vector-iterators.md and the TUPLE_ENTRY stuff in riscv-vector-switch.def.
>
> Robin, do you remember why you had to adjust all the iterators? Was it
> that LTO
Hi!
Here is an updated version of the patch.
My reading of C23 is that if some aggregate field is initialized with
{} (which is supposed to newly clear padding bits) and then its
subobjects are overridden with designated initializers, then the
padding bits are cleared property should be kept unle
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> Seems that the testsuite and build system are the main things to watch
> out for here right?
Yes, as illustrated by the draft patch linked from bug 81358 comment 11.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmy...@redhat.com
The sparc port gained LRA support in r7-5076-gf99bd883fb0d05 and has
defaulted to LRA since r7-5642-g70a6dbe7e37e69.
Let's finish the transition by dropping -mlra entirely.
Tested on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/113952
* config/sparc/sp
ChangeLog:
* MAINTAINERS: Fix Write After Approval name order.
Signed-off-by: Filip Kastl
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cf1cf78e16c..269ac2ea6b4 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -760,7 +76
Sam James writes:
> Add -Werror=lto-type-mismatch,odr to bootstrap-lto* configurations to
> help stop LTO breakage/correctness issues sneaking in.
>
> We discussed -Werror=strict-aliasing but it runs early and doesn't
> give better diagnostics with LTO so left it out.
>
> config/ChangeLog:
>
On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 16:18 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 07:56 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Also note if we think it's basically working I can flip my tester to
> > default to LRA. It bootstraps and regtests alpha once a week via qemu.
> >
> > I think it's testin
> This should be documented in install.texi.
Right. Sorry I forgot that piece.
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 05:26:51PM +0530, jeevitha wrote:
> Corrected the function code for the Atomic Memory Operation "Fetch and
> Decrement
> Bounded", changing it from 0x1A to 0x1C.
... which is the correct value. :-)
> 2024-10-14 Jeevitha Palanisamy
>
> gcc/
> * config/rs6000/
From: Andi Kleen
Passes test suite. Ok to commit?
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/116510
* tree-if-conv.cc (predicate_bbs): Add missing fold_converts.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-switch-ifcvt-3.c: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-switch-ifcvt-
Thanks.
Pushed as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=e7380688fa5917011c3fb85b5e06fb00f776a95d
Qing
> On Oct 15, 2024, at 12:23, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>> Hi, This is the 8th version of the patch.
>>
>> Compared to the 7th version, the maj
LGTM
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2024-10-15 20:55
To: gcc-patches
CC: pal...@dabbelt.com; kito.ch...@gmail.com; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai;
jeffreya...@gmail.com; pan2...@intel.com; rdapp@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Use biggest_mode as mode for constants.
Hi,
in compute
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
