On Sat 6. Apr 2024 at 06:52, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 3/27/24 4:55 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> > Jeff,
> >
> > just a heads-up that that trunk (i.e., the soon-to-be GCC14) still
> > generates the suboptimal sequence:
> >https://godbolt.org/z/K9YYEPsvY
> Realistically it's too late to get thi
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Don't use implicit shift count in double-precision shifts in AT&T syntax
> since they aren't in Intel SDM. Keep the 's' modifier for backward
> compatibility with inline asm statements.
>
> PR target/114590
> * config/i386/i386.md
On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 15:03 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> +/* Alignment for functions loops and jumps for best performance. For new
> + uarchs the value should be measured via benchmarking. See the
> documentation
> + for -falign-functions -falign-loops and -falign-jumps in invoke.texi for
> t
On 06/04/2024 07:50, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 05.04.2024 um 21:59 schrieb Jørgen Kvalsvik :
Hi,
I propose these fixes for the current issues with the condition
coverage.
Rainer, I propose to simply delete the test with __sigsetjmp. I don't
think it actually detects anything reasonable any
Kindly ping for this ice.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2024 1:45 PM
To: Jeff Law ; Robin Dapp ;
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; richard.guent...@gmail.com;
Wang, Yanzhang ; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2]
From: Pan Li
This patch would like to add the middle-end presentation for the
saturation add. Aka set the result of add to the max when overflow.
It will take the pattern similar as below.
SAT_ADD (x, y) => (x + y) | (-(TYPE)((TYPE)(x + y) < x))
Take uint8_t as example, we will have:
* SAT_AD
Hi,
This patch merges the D front-end and runtime library with upstream dmd
b65767825f, and the standard library with phobos 92dc5a4e9.
Synchronizing with the upstream release of v2.108.0.
D front-end changes:
- Import dmd v2.108.0.
D runtime changes:
- Import druntime v2.108.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 11:29 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:07:41PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following avoids re-walking and re-combining the instructions
> > between i2 and i3 when the pattern of i2 doesn't change.
> >
> > Bootstrap and regtest run
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:52 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> aarch64-sve.md had a pattern that combined:
>
> cmpeq pb.T, pa/z, zc.T, #0
> mov zd.T, pb/z, #1
>
> into:
>
> cnotzd.T, pa/m, zc.T
>
> But this is only valid if pa.T is a ptrue. In other cases, the
> ori
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file, 'gcc-14.1-b20240218.fr.po',
Hi!
The following testcase is miscompiled, because we have initially
a movti which loads the 0x3f803f80ULL TImode constant
from constant pool. Later on we split it into a pair of DImode
loads. Now, for the first load (why just that?, though not stage4
material) we trigger the peephole2 w
On 06/04/2024 13:15, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 06/04/2024 07:50, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 05.04.2024 um 21:59 schrieb Jørgen Kvalsvik :
Hi,
I propose these fixes for the current issues with the condition
coverage.
Rainer, I propose to simply delete the test with __sigsetjmp. I don't
think
> Am 06.04.2024 um 22:41 schrieb Jørgen Kvalsvik :
>
> On 06/04/2024 13:15, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2024 07:50, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>>
Am 05.04.2024 um 21:59 schrieb Jørgen Kvalsvik :
Hi,
I propose these fixes for the current issues with the con
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:28 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I'd like to ping the
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647634.html
> PR112560 P1 patch.
If there are no further comments, I plan to commit the referred patch
to the mainline on Wednesday. The latest version can be considere
14 matches
Mail list logo
