Hi!
The r14-870 changes broke xtb package tests (reduced testcase is the first
one below) and caused ICEs on a test derived from that (the second one).
For the
x = T(u = trim (us(1)))
statement, before that change gfortran used to emit weird code with
2 trim calls:
_gfortran_string_trim (&
In addition to underlines and strikethroughs. This makes it easier to
spot the differences in example code changes.
---
htdocs/gcc.css | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc.css b/htdocs/gcc.css
index 77d01ee0..e32c4b93 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc.css
+++ b/htdocs/gcc.css
---
htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html | 46 ---
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
index bbbaa25a..123b5e9f 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/p
---
htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html | 43 +++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
index 123b5e9f..ab65c5e7 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
@
On 2/16/24 17:06, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:39:47PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ /* We also have to defer checking when we're in a template and couldn't
+ instantiate & evaluate the noexcept to true/false. */
+ if (processi
> OK for trunk?
> I think simple enough to backport to 13 as well.
OK, but probably best to wait a few weeks before backporting.
FX
> OK for trunk and later backport to 13?
OK. Thanks for the patch!
FX
From: Pan Li
This patch would like to add the middle-end presentation for the
unsigned saturation add. Aka set the result of add to the max
when overflow. It will take the pattern similar as below.
SAT_ADDU (x, y) => (x + y) | (-(TYPE)((TYPE)(x + y) < x))
Take uint8_t as example, we will have
Thanks for the link, tested and committed.
On 15/02/2024 19:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 18:38, François Dumont
wrote:
On 15/02/2024 14:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 21:48, François Dumont
wrote:
On 14/02/2024 20:44, Jonat
Hi Jakub,
On 2/17/24 10:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The r14-870 changes broke xtb package tests (reduced testcase is the first
one below) and caused ICEs on a test derived from that (the second one).
[...]
thanks for your detailed analysis and for the patch, which puts
things in straight ord
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:05:16PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> > +program pr113503
> > + implicit none
> > + type :: T
> > +character(len=:), allocatable :: u
> > + end type
> > + character(len=20) :: us(1) = 'foobar'
> > + type(T) :: x
> > + x = T(u = trim (us(1))) ! { dg-bogus "is us
David: Ping.
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 08:36 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> Here's the updated patch.
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 20:15 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 17:34 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch adds checks gcc_jit_block_add_assig
David: Ping.
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:21 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> David: Ping.
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 17:16 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > All of these are fixed in this new patch.
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 18:05 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Fri,
David: Ping.
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:59 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> David: Ping.
>
> On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 11:59 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds the ability to send const pointer as argument to a
> > function.
> > Thanks for the review.
>
David: Ping.
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 16:04 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 13:10 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 18:42 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch fixes the bug 113343.
> > > I'm wondering if there's a
David: Ping.
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 10:36 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Yes, it is for a use case inside of rustc_codegen_gcc.
> The compiler is structured in a way where we don't know if a global
> variable might be constant when it is created.
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 10:09 -0500, David Malcol
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In addition to underlines and strikethroughs. This makes it easier to
> spot the differences in example code changes.
Looks like a good idea!
Thanks,
Gerald
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:52:17PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
> > in running the test at lower optimization levels. At the same time the
>
> That is ge
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:59:12PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:52:17PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > > The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
> > > in running th
When not optimized for speed, the test for PR112344 takes several
seconds to execute on native x86_64, and 15 minutes on PRU target
simulator. Thus mark those variants as expensive. The -O2 variant
which originally triggered the PR is not expensive, hence it is
still run by default.
Ok for trunk
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:15:55PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> When not optimized for speed, the test for PR112344 takes several
> seconds to execute on native x86_64, and 15 minutes on PRU target
> simulator. Thus mark those variants as expensive. The -O2 variant
> which originally triggere
Florian Weimer writes:
> ---
> htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html | 43
> +++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
> index 123b5e9f..ab65c5e7 100644
> --- a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.
Florian Weimer writes:
> ---
> htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html | 46
> ---
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
> index bbbaa25a..123b5e9f 100644
> --- a/htdocs/gc
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Chinese (simplified) team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/zh_CN.po
(This file, 'gcc-13.2.
Pushed to r14-9053.
在 2024/2/6 上午10:10, Lulu Cheng 写道:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/larchintrin.h (__iocsrrd_h): Modify the
function return value type to unsigned short.
---
gcc/config/loongarch/larchintrin.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --
Pushed to r14-9054.
在 2024/2/6 上午10:10, Lulu Cheng 写道:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/larchintrin.h (__movgr2fcsr): Remove redundant
symbol type conversions.
(__cacop_d): Likewise.
(__cpucfg): Likewise.
(__asrtle_d): Likewise.
(__asrtgt_d): Lik
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:33 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Since push2/pop2 requires 16-byte stack alignment, don't generate them
> if the incoming stack isn't 16-byte aligned.
Ok.
>
> gcc/
>
> PR target/113912
> * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_can_use_push2pop2): New.
> (ix86_pro_and_
Hi, Robin. Could you continue on this LICM issue ?
I am not sure whether my fix is correct, or you may find another way to make
LICM works ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2024-02-06 21:14
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.cheng
CC: rdapp.gcc; gcc-patches; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Su
28 matches
Mail list logo
