RE: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV integer reduction in ZVE32/64.

2023-06-16 Thread Li, Pan2 via Gcc-patches
Committed, thanks Jeff. Pan -Original Message- From: Jeff Law Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 11:56 PM To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches Cc: Robin Dapp ; Wang, Yanzhang ; kito.cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV integer reduction in ZVE32/64. On 6/16/2

Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Implement vec_set and vec_extract.

2023-06-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/16/23 07:55, 钟居哲 wrote: LGTM OK for the trunk. Sorry for the delays. jeff

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add autovec FP unary operations.

2023-06-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/14/23 15:15, 钟居哲 wrote: Hi, Jeff.  Thanks for quick approval. When I reviewed the patch: (define_expand "2"   [(set (match_operand:VF 0 "register_operand")     (any_float_unop_nofrm:VF      (match_operand:VF 1 "register_operand")))] "TARGET_VECTOR" {   insn_code icode = code_for_pred

Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Add autovec FP unary operations.

2023-06-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/16/23 07:44, juzhe.zhong wrote: lgtm Which is good enough for me. Ok for the trunk. jeff

Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Add autovec FP binary operations.

2023-06-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/16/23 07:43, juzhe.zhong wrote: lgtm ACK for the trunk. jeff

Re: [PATCH] simplify-rtx: Simplify VEC_CONCAT of SUBREG and VEC_CONCAT from same vector

2023-06-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/16/23 03:06, Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi all, In the testcase for this patch we try to vec_concat the lowpart and highpart of a vector, but the lowpart is expressed as a subreg. simplify-rtx.cc does not recognise this and combine ends up trying to match: Trying 7 -> 8:

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-16 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:49 PM Ben Boeckel wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 21:59:13 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > This patch series causes ICEs on arm-linux-gnueabihf. Would you > > please investigate? Please let me know if you need any in reproducing > > these. > > Finally back at it. I

<    1   2