On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:53 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
> testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
> kept the file since it was showing unpleasant behaviour.
>
> Most of the time is
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 8:06 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:03 AM Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 2:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
while updating compute_points_to_sets I missed that the code not only
sets the nonlocal/escaped flags but also initializes pt. With my
previous change if uses_global_memory is false pt is not updated
correctly which may lead to wrong code.
This is fixed by the following patch I comitted to av
Hi
Here is the new proposal. My only concern is that we are also using
hash or equal_to functors in the guard destructor.
I am going to enhance merge normal implementation to make use of
the cached hash code when hash functors are the same between the source
and destination of nodes.
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021, 14:49 François Dumont via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is the new proposal. My only concern is that we are also using
> hash or equal_to functors in the guard destructor.
>
Can we catch any exception there, invalidate all iterators, and not r
On October 16, 2021 2:47:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>Hi,
>while updating compute_points_to_sets I missed that the code not only
>sets the nonlocal/escaped flags but also initializes pt. With my
>previous change if uses_global_memory is false pt is not updated
>correctly
---
htdocs/codingconventions.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/codingconventions.html b/htdocs/codingconventions.html
index 21cc95de..e4d30510 100644
--- a/htdocs/codingconventions.html
+++ b/htdocs/codingconventions.html
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ a large ba
The www.dwarfstd.org webmasters suggested (via a redirect) to adjust
http links to https.
---
htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html
index 5103e5ee..dae1735d 100644
--- a/htd
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:46 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On October 16, 2021 2:47:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >while updating compute_points_to_sets I missed that the code not only
> >sets the nonlocal/escaped flags but also initializes pt. Wi
On Linux/x86_64,
99b287b8ef51a0be52f7400879a619dc5f993f31 is the first bad commit
commit 99b287b8ef51a0be52f7400879a619dc5f993f31
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 16 14:45:06 2021 +0200
Fix wrong code in ldost-strlen-1.c
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 -O1 executio
> On 16 Oct 2021, at 10:27, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:53 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking at the pathological time issue ranger has with the
>> testcase from, uh.. PR 97623 I think. I've lost the details, but
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 8:06 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:03 AM Richard Biener
> > > > wrot
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:04 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 8:06 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:42 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
Hi,
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 -O1 execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 -Os execution test
Sorry for the breakage. This time it seems like bug in Fortran FE
which was previously latent:
__attribute__((fn spec (". . R ")))
void subfunc (character
Hi Honza,
On 16.10.21 20:23, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches wrote:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 -Os execution test
Sorry for the breakage. This time it seems like bug in Fortran FE
which was previously latent:
__
>
> Fortran has for a long time 'character(len=5), allocatable" or
> "character(len=*)". In the first case, the "5" can be ignored as both
> caller and callee know the length. In the second case, the length is
> determined by the argument, but it cannot be changed.
>
> Since a not-that-short whil
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:14 AM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Go on master branch isn't buildable on AIX. What should I do
> next to get my libffi sync patches into master branch?
Is the only problem you are having the missing-objcopy problem? To
fix that one, install the GNU binutils.
T
* value-query.cc (get_ssa_name_ptr_info_nonnull): Change
set_ptr_nonull to set_ptr_nonnull in comments.
---
gcc/value-query.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/value-query.cc b/gcc/value-query.cc
index ab133aab114..17ebd86ce5f 100644
--- a/gcc
On 10/15/2021 9:27 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/14/21 16:27, Jeff Law wrote:
So what's the preferred way to handle this? We're in the process of
evaluating -frename-registers on our target right now and subject to
verification of a couple issues, our inclination is to turn it on for
our t
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 1:13 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:04 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 8:06 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:53 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 1:13 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:04 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM David Edelsohn
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:59 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:53 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 1:13 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:04 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
This patch is mostly motivated by distribution needs in general
and Debian/Ubuntu needs in particular – but I think it makes
sense for all GCC 11 users.
GCC's AMD GCN support uses LLVM's assembler and linker mc/lld
and thus requires compatibility with LLVM. On mainline, support
for LLVM 13 was ad
These two redirected from golang.org to pkg.go.dev.
---
htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
index a346c7f6..05e796dd 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-5/change
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 04:09:05AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Only powerpc64-unknown-freebsd was checked for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Kubaj
Thanks!
I pushed this now, with commit message (including changelog, which is
required):
===
gcc/configure: Check for powerpc64le*-*-freebsd*
Only powe
Changes since v5[5]:
- Reworked all builtins to accept the FE_* macros as parameters and
so be agnostic to libc implementations. Largely based of
fpclassify. To that end, there is some new files changed:
+ Change the argument list for the builtins declarations in
builtins.def
On 21-10-16 18:57:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 04:09:05AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > Only powerpc64-unknown-freebsd was checked for.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Kubaj
>
> Thanks!
>
> I pushed this now, with commit message (including changelog, which is
> required)
On 10/6/2021 4:22 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
[Here go the bits by Richi, tested on x86-64 Linux, and ongoing tests
on aarch64 and ppc64le.]
There is a lot of fall-out from this patch, as there were many threading
tests that assumed the restrictions introduced by this patch were valid.
Some tes
28 matches
Mail list logo
