Commit message shamelessly copied from 1777beb6b129 by jakub:
This function, because it is sometimes called even outside of function
bodies, uses create_tmp_var_raw rather than create_tmp_var. But in order
for that to work, when first referenced, the VAR_DECLs need to appear in a
TARGET_EXPR so t
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the prompt review!
on 2021/6/23 上午2:56, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:27:06PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Recently if we build gcc on Power with the assembler which doesn't
>> have Power10 support, the build will fail when building libgcc wit
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 19:45, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > This change causes us to reject some container CTAD examples in the
> > libstdc++ testsuite due to deduction failure for {}, which AFAICT is the
> > correct behavior. Previously, in the case of e.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:01:24PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/21/21 1:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/18/21 4:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:43 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
On 6/22/21 12:20 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Ok for master?
>
>
>
> s390 glibc does not need counters in the .data section, since it stores
> edge hits in its own data structure. Therefore counters only waste
> space and confuse diffing tools
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Okay.
>
> Now, I believe that we agreed on the following:
>
> For this current patch:
>
> 1. Use byte-repeatable pattern for pattern-initialization;
> 2. Use one pattern for all types;
> 3. Use “0xFE” for the byte pattern value.
Ack.
Richard.
> Possibl
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, 05:20 Patrick Palka via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 19:45, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > This change causes us to reject some container CTAD examples in the
> > > libstdc++ testsuite due to
Hi David,
Did you have a chance to take look at this patch ?
Thanks,
Clément
>
> +DavidMalcolm
>
> Can you review this patch when you have a moment?
>
> Thanks, David
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:05 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> The aix.h change is okay with me, but you need to get approval
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo