Hi Harald, hi Paul,
On 13.03.21 09:58, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote:
I am not sure of the etiquette for this - it looks OK to me :-)
:-)
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 21:20, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
the addition of runtime checks for the SIZE intrinsic created a regression
that showed
Early ping – and minor post script:
+ hidden_typelist = TREE_CHAIN (hidden_typelist);
This change is to avoid running into the ICE:
gcc_assert (hidden_typelist == NULL_TREE
|| TREE_VALUE (hidden_typelist) == void_type_node);
The purpose of this assert is to check that t
Excerpts from Iain Sandoe's message of March 13, 2021 6:09 pm:
> Hi Iain,
>
> Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes an ICE caused by emutls routines generating a weak,
>> non-public symbol for storing the initializer of a weak TLS variable.
>>
>> In get_emutls_init_templ_addr,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:56 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > I can test it on avx512{bw,vl,dq} hw tonight if you want.
> >
> > I'm testing the patch on avx2 hw, which is not representative of this
> > change. So if you
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:39 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:37 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:20 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:21 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:22 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > >
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:39 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:37 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:20 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:21 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 8:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > Done. Here is the updated patch. Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for master?
> >
> > I don't understand the purpose of the current_output_insn check and I
> > don't know if the usage of current_output_insn is correct. The
> > comments are not help
Hi Tobias,
> I do not see any reason why 'tmp' is replaced by 'temp' in this
> code. Also for doing patch archeology, it helps if there are no
> changes unless it makes sense. Adding an -e- does not count ;-)
>
> Hence, OK with that change.
I've corrected that. This also reduces the size of the
Hello world,
the attached, rather obvious patch fixes an ICE on valid which
came about because I did not handle EXEC_IOLENGTH as start of
an I/O statement when checking for the DO loop variable.
This is an 11 regression.
Thanks to Harald for reducing this down to the bare
minimum.
Regression-te
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:43 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 8:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > Done. Here is the updated patch. Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for
> > > > master?
> > >
> > > I don't understand the purpose of the current_output_insn check and I
> > > don't know if
Hello again Kito.
I've now delved a bit deeper into the failure of the testcase
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35318.c on big endian RV32.
The point at which big endian diverges from little endian is where
process_alt_operands() is processing the "%0" constraint. It calls
operands_match_p(), which su
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-11.1-b20210207.sv.po'
Hi
In the compiler-only idiom:
" a = (target expr creates temp, op uses temp) "
the target expression variable needs to be promoted to a frame one
(if the expression has a suspend point). However, the only uses of
the var are in the second part of the compound expression - and we
were creating an
Hi
Apparently, I had a brainstorm when posting patches to cover the
cases with await expressions in do {} while; and while {} ; and
omitted the for loop case.
Fixed thus.
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu and with cppcoro and
folly/coroutines.
OK for master / 10.x?
thanks
Iain
gcc/cp/
Hi
Although there is still some discussion in CWG2451 on this, the
implementors are agreed on the intent (thus it is wording that is
expected to change - the implementations should be brought into
sync).
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu and with cppcoro and
folly/coroutines.
OK for mast
Hi
The awaiter.await_ready() should be converted per [expr.await]/3
(3.6) await-ready is the expression e.await_ready(), contextually
converted to bool.
The conversion had been omitted, fixed as below,
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu, and on cppcoro and
folly/coroutines.
OK for
Hi
We need to add the symbols for to_chars and from_chars for the
long double cases.
The testsuite test cases fail to build without this, so there’s no need
for an additional test.
Tested on powerpc-darwin9.
OK for master?
thanks
Iain
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* config/os/bsd/darwin/ppc-
Hi,
What is slightly odd here is that this problem shows up for
installed testing, but not when the test-suite is run in-tree.
However, the issue is clear (and doesn’t need to depend on
figuring out why it doesn’t show in-tree).
tested on powerpc-darwin9, x86_64-darwin
OK for master?
thanks
Iai
Hi,
This patch adds const_anchor for rs6000. The const_anchor is used
in cse pass.
The attachment are the patch diff and change log file.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le with no regressions. Is this
okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
* config/rs6
Hi,
This patch fixes an ICE found by enabling const_anchor for rs6000.
The BLKmode constant rtx is sent to try_const_anchors which causes
assertion failure in try_const_anchors.
The attachment are the patch diff and change log file.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le with no
20 matches
Mail list logo
