Hi Jakub,
>> I have applied your other suggestions, and have retested the gomp.exp and
>> libgomp tests. The full testrun started yesterday showed no regressions. If
>> you have no further issues then I will commit this later tonight ahead of
>> stage4.
>
> LGTM, thanks.
this patch broke Solaris
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:26:26PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> I have applied your other suggestions, and have retested the gomp.exp and
> >> libgomp tests. The full testrun started yesterday showed no regressions. If
> >> you have no further issues then I will commit this later tonight ahead of
Hi Jakub,
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:26:26PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> >> I have applied your other suggestions, and have retested the gomp.exp and
>> >> libgomp tests. The full testrun started yesterday showed no regressions.
>> >> If
>> >> you have no further issues then I will commit this
On Jan 17 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Kwok, I guess you can reproduce it even on Linux with --disable-linux-futex
And all targets that are not explicitly configured in
libcomp/configure.tgt, where --enable-linux-futex is a no-op.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.o
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 04:25:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jan 17 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Kwok, I guess you can reproduce it even on Linux with --disable-linux-futex
>
> And all targets that are not explicitly configured in
> libcomp/configure.tgt, where --enabl
> The new gcc.target/i386/pr98100.c test FAILs on Solaris/x86:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr98100.c (test for excess errors)
>
> Excess errors:
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98100.c:6:1:
> error: the call requires 'ifunc', which is not supported by this target
>
>
---
htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
index 3527428f..dac3a03f 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
@@ -409,7 +409,19 @@ a work-in
Hello world,
the patch (committed after Nicolas' OK) should make it possible
to go one step further in testing with Darwin.
So, it might now be possible to do another round of testing,
to see if there are any other walls to hit :-)
Best regards
Thomas
Use an initial shared memory size
On Linux/x86_64,
3804e937b0e252a7e42632fe6d9f898f1851a49c is the first bad commit
commit 3804e937b0e252a7e42632fe6d9f898f1851a49c
Author: Mark Wielaard
Date: Tue Sep 29 15:52:44 2020 +0200
Default to DWARF5
caused
with GCC configured with
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make c
Am Freitag, den 01.01.2021, 00:01 + schrieb Joseph Myers:
>
>
> I'd expect c2x-* tests to use -std=c2x not -std=gnu2x. Tests needing
> -std=gnu2x can be gnu2x-* tests, but you should be able to test the types
> using _Generic without needing any gnu2x features. c2x-* tests should
> also
Hi,
after switching to materialization of clones on demand, the verifier
can happen to see edges leading to a clone of a materialized clone.
This means its clone_of is NULL and former_clone_of needs to be
checked in order to verify that the callee is a clone of the original
decl, which it did not
More exhaustively testing the MEM_REF formatting change by
pretty-printing every MEM_REF the tree-ssa-uninit pass encounters
triggered another ICE, this one due to assuming SSA_NAME_IDENTIFIER
is non- null. I have committed as "obvious" the attached patch to
remove the assumption after testing it
> This is a repost of:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-February/539763.html
>
> which was initially posted during stage 4. (And yeah, I only just
> missed stage 4 again.)
>
> IMO it would be better to fix the bug directly (as the patch tries
> to do) instead of wait for a m
GCC now defaults to DWARF 5. AIX only supports DWARF 4 (3.5).
This patch overrides the default DWARF version to 4 unless explicitly
stated.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/aix71.h (SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS): Override
dwarf_version to 4.
* con
Hello,
here is a patch which merges the gm2 front end into the GCC tree. The
patches have been boostrapped under x86_64 GNU/Linux Debian Stretch
built using make -j 24 and also under x86_64 GNU/Linux Debian Buster
using make -j 4.
Tested on Debian Stretch x86_64
===
This is an updated version of this patch from October:
'RFC: add "deallocated_by" attribute for use by analyzer'
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/44.html
reworking it to build on top of Martin's work as noted below, reusing
the existing attribute rather than adding
Here after resolving the address of a template-id inside decltype, we
end up instantiating the chosen specialization from the call to
mark_used in resolve_nondeduced_context, even though only its type is
needed.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look for
trunk?
gcc/cp/C
When parsing the base-clause of a class declaration, we need to defer
access checking until the entire base-clause has been seen, so that
access can be properly checked relative to the scope of the class with
all its bases attached. This allows us to accept the declaration of
struct D from Example
From: gengqi
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/arch-canonicalize
(longext_sort): New function for sorting 'multi-letter'.
* config/riscv/multilib-generator: Adjusting the loop of 'alt' in
'alts'. The 'arch' may not be the first of 'alts'.
(_expand_combination):
Hello Jakub,
On 17/01/2021 17:04, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 04:25:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jan 17 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Kwok, I guess you can reproduce it even on Linux with --disable-linux-futex
And all targets that are no
On 1/17/21 12:08 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
---
htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
index 3527428f..dac3a03f 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gc
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:10:07AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
>
> On 17/01/2021 17:04, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 04:25:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > On Jan 17 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > >
> > > > Kwok, I gue
From: gengqi
Think about this case:
./multilib-generator rv32imc-ilp32-rv32imac,rv32imacxthead-f
Here are 2 problems:
1. A unexpected 'xtheadf' extension was made.
2. The arch 'rv32imac' was not be created.
This modification fix these two, and also sorts 'multi-letter'.
gcc/ChangeLog:
23 matches
Mail list logo